Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126253›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Enabling phenotypic big data with PheNorm.

Sheng Yu, Yumeng Ma, Jessica Gronsbell, Tianrun Cai, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, Vivian S Gainer, Susanne E Churchill, Peter Szolovits, Shawn N Murphy, Isaac S Kohane and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Illuminating the landscape of high-level clinical trial opportunities in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  16. A hybrid framework with large language models for rare disease phenotyping.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  17. A general framework for developing computable clinical phenotype algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sheng YuCenter for Statistical Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yumeng MaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jessica GronsbellDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Tianrun CaiDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ashwin N AnanthakrishnanDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vivian S GainerResearch Information Science and Computing, Partners HealthCare, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Susanne E ChurchillDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter SzolovitsComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shawn N MurphyResearch Information Science and Computing, Partners HealthCare, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Isaac S KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine P LiaoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
Pilot & Feasibility ProgramP30DK043351 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG · 1991 to 2026
$35.3M
TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
Research ProjectP50MH106933 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$17.0M
VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Daniel Hal Solomon · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Statistical Methods for Optimizing Personalized Treatment SelectionR01HL089778 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LU TIAN · 2008 to 2026
$4.8M
Lipids, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid ArthritisR01HL127118 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIAO, KATHERINE PHOENIX · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
Genetic predictors of anti-TNF treatment response and infections in IBDK23DK097142 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANANTHAKRISHNAN, ASHWIN N · 2012 to 2016
$846k
Semi-supervised learning with electronic medical recordsF31GM119263 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GRONSBELL, JESSICA · 2016 to 2016
$34k
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089778NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127118NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK097142NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK043351NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM119263NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106933NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotyping infers whether a patient has a disease based on the information in his or her EHR. A human-annotated training set with gold-standard disease status labels is usually required to build an algorithm for phenotyping based on a set of predictive features. The time intensiveness of annotation and feature curation severely limits the ability to achieve high-throughput phenotyping. While previous studies have successfully automated feature curation, annotation remains a major bottleneck. In this paper, we present PheNorm, a phenotyping algorithm that does not require expert-labeled samples for training. Methods: The most predictive features, such as the number of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes or mentions of the target phenotype, are normalized to resemble a normal mixture distribution with high area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for prediction. The transformed features are then denoised and combined into a score for accurate disease classification. Results: We validated the accuracy of PheNorm with 4 phenotypes: coronary artery disease, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. The AUCs of the PheNorm score reached 0.90, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.94 for the 4 phenotypes, respectively, which were comparable to the accuracy of supervised algorithms trained with sample sizes of 100-300, with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The accuracy of the PheNorm algorithms is on par with algorithms trained with annotated samples. PheNorm fully automates the generation of accurate phenotyping algorithms and demonstrates the capacity for EHR-driven annotations to scale to the next level - phenotypic big data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBig DataElectronic Health RecordsPhenotypeArea Under CurveDatasets as TopicHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsInternational Classification of DiseasesPeptidesPrecision MedicineIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPeptidesphenomycinelectronic health recordshigh-throughput phenotypingphenotypic big dataprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID29126253
PMCPMC6251688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.