Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126246›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Bringing numerous methods for expression and promoter analysis to a public cloud computing service.

Krzysztof Polanski, Bo Gao, Sam A Mason, Paul Brown, Sascha Ott, Katherine J Denby, David L Wild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krzysztof PolanskiDepartment of Statistics.
Bo GaoDepartment of Statistics.
Sam A MasonSystems Biology Centre.
Paul BrownDepartment of Mathematics.
Sascha OttSystems Biology Centre.
Katherine J DenbyDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
David L WildDepartment of Statistics.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018431/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Every year, a large number of novel algorithms are introduced to the scientific community for a myriad of applications, but using these across different research groups is often troublesome, due to suboptimal implementations and specific dependency requirements. This does not have to be the case, as public cloud computing services can easily house tractable implementations within self-contained dependency environments, making the methods easily accessible to a wider public. We have taken 14 popular methods, the majority related to expression data or promoter analysis, developed these up to a good implementation standard and housed the tools in isolated Docker containers which we integrated into the CyVerse Discovery Environment, making these easily usable for a wide community as part of the CyVerse UK project. Availability and implementation: The integrated apps can be found at http://www.cyverse.org/discovery-environment, while the raw code is available at https://github.com/cyversewarwick and the corresponding Docker images are housed at https://hub.docker.com/r/cyversewarwick/. Contact: info@cyverse.warwick.ac.uk or D.L.Wild@warwick.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingGene Expression RegulationPromoter Regions, GeneticSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID29126246
PMCPMC6030968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.