Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126203›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2018

A randomized phase II study of everolimus in combination with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0913.

Prakash Chinnaiyan, Minhee Won, Patrick Y Wen, Amyn M Rojiani, Maria Werner-Wasik, Helen A Shih, Lynn S Ashby, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, Volker W Stieber, Shawn C Malone and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01062399 (Phase I/II Trial of Concurrent RAD001), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01062399 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Phase I/II Trial of Concurrent RAD001 (Everolimus) With Temozolomide/Radiation Followed by Adjuvant RAD001/Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadiation Therapy Oncology GroupRan2010 to 2022Enrolled279ConditionsBrain and Central Nervous System TumorsArmsconcurrent RAD001 10 mg/day, concurrent temozolomide, Radiation therapy, concurrent RAD001 2.5 mg/day, concurrent RAD001 5 mg/day
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds enhance standard of care for glioblastoma via localized targeted therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Prakash ChinnaiyanWilliam Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Minhee WonNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrick Y WenDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amyn M RojianiAugusta University-Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Maria Werner-WasikThomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Helen A ShihMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lynn S AshbyBarrow Neurological Institute accruals under Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael YuH. Lee Moffitt Cancer, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Volker W StieberNovant Health Forsyth Regional Cancer Center accruals under Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Inc, CCOP, Goldsboro, North Carolina, USA.
Shawn C MaloneThe Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
John B FiveashUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Nimish A MohileUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Manmeet S AhluwaliaCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Merideth M WendlandWillamette Valley Cancer Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Philip J StellaSaint Joseph Mercy Hospital accruals under Michigan Cancer Research Consortium CCOP, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA.
Andrew Y KeeLegacy Health Systems accruals under Mayo Clinic, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Minesh P MehtaBaptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Arizona Oncology · USAugusta University · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USCleveland Clinic · USDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMichigan Cancer Research Consortium · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNRG Oncology · USOttawa Regional Cancer Foundation · CARegional Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Rochester · USWillamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam, GREG YOTHERS · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This phase II study was designed to determine the efficacy of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus administered daily with conventional radiation therapy and chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Patients were randomized to radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide with or without daily everolimus (10 mg). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities. Results: A total of 171 patients were randomized and deemed eligible for this study. Patients randomized to receive everolimus experienced a significant increase in both grade 4 toxicities, including lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia, and treatment-related deaths. There was no significant difference in PFS between patients randomized to everolimus compared with control (median PFS time: 8.2 vs 10.2 mo, respectively; P = 0.79). OS for patients randomized to receive everolimus was inferior to that for control patients (median survival time: 16.5 vs 21.2 mo, respectively; P = 0.008). A similar trend was observed in both O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter hypermethylated and unmethylated tumors. Conclusion: Combining everolimus with conventional chemoradiation leads to increased treatment-related toxicities and does not improve PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Although the median survival time in patients receiving everolimus was comparable to contemporary studies, it was inferior to the control in this randomized study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDacarbazineEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateDacarbazineEverolimusTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID29126203
PMCPMC5892159
OpenAlexW2770221757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.