Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126163›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2018

Identification of cancer biomarkers of prognostic value using specific gene regulatory networks (GRN): a novel role of RAD51AP1 for ovarian and lung cancers.

Dimple Chudasama, Valeria Bo, Marcia Hall, Vladimir Anikin, Jeyarooban Jeyaneethi, Jane Gregory, George Pados, Allan Tucker, Amanda Harvey, Ryan Pink and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Research Advances of RAD51AP1 in Tumor Progression and Drug Resistance].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dimple ChudasamaInstitute for Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Valeria BoDepartment of Computer Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Marcia HallMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Vladimir AnikinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Trust, Harefield, UK.
Jeyarooban JeyaneethiInstitute for Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Jane GregoryDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Trust, Harefield, UK.
George PadosUniversity of Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Allan TuckerDepartment of Computer Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Amanda HarveyInstitute for Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Ryan PinkDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Emmanouil KarterisInstitute for Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Brunel University of London · GBHarefield Hospital · GBAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRMount Vernon Cancer Centre · GBOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, microarray analyses have led to the discovery of numerous individual 'molecular signatures' associated with specific cancers. However, there are serious limitations for the adoption of these multi-gene signatures in the clinical environment for diagnostic or prognostic testing as studies with more power need to be carried out. This may involve larger richer cohorts and more advanced analyses. In this study, we conduct analyses-based on gene regulatory network-to reveal distinct and common biomarkers across cancer types. Using microarray data of triple-negative and medullary breast, ovarian and lung cancers applied to a combination of glasso and Bayesian networks (BNs), we derived a unique network-containing genes that are uniquely involved: small proline-rich protein 1A (SPRR1A), follistatin like 1 (FSTL1), collagen type XII alpha 1 (COL12A1) and RAD51 associated protein 1 (RAD51AP1). RAD51AP1 and FSTL1 are significantly overexpressed in ovarian cancer patients but only RAD51AP1 is upregulated in lung cancer patients compared with healthy controls. The upregulation of RAD51AP1 was mirrored in the bloods of both ovarian and lung cancer patients, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots predicted poorer overall survival (OS) in patients with high expression of RAD51AP1. Suppression of RAD51AP1 by RNA interference reduced cell proliferation in vitro in ovarian (SKOV3) and lung (A549) cancer cells. This effect appears to be modulated by a decrease in the expression of mTOR-related genes and pro-metastatic candidate genes. Our data describe how an initial in silico approach can generate novel biomarkers that could potentially support current clinical practice and improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, MedullaryCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisRNA-Binding ProteinsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsRAD51AP1 protein, humanRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29126163
PMCPMC5862298
OpenAlexW2767368861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.