ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic value of surveillanceEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate fludeoxyglucose-positron emission ;tomography/CT's (FDG-PET/CT) performance in the follow ;up of patients with surgically treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
methodsThe follow-up FDG-PET/CT scans of 162 consecutive patients with surgically treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. Histopathological and/or imaging examinations confirmed recurrent disease. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative and positive predictive values were calculated.
resultsRecurrence occurred in 71 (43%) patients, usually within the first year following surgery (60%) and in more than one site (76%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for anastomotic recurrence were 77, 76, 16, 98 and 76%; for regional nodal recurrence were 88, 85, 43, 97 and 86%; and for distant metastatic recurrence were: 97, 96, 91, 99 and 96%. In 5 of the 42 patients (12%) with distant metastases, the metastatic sites were outside the area covered by a conventional follow-up chest-abdomen CT and in 4 patients (9%) metastases were barely perceptible on the CT component of the FDG-PET/CT and consequently were unlikely to be detected without the aid of the FDG uptake.
conclusionFDG PET/CT is accurate in detecting oesophageal adenocarcinoma recurrence, especially within the first post-operative year when most recurrences occur, and is useful in identifying patients with a solitary metastasis. Advances in knowledge: FDG-PET/CT should be considered as a valuable tool in the routine follow ;up of surgically treated oesophageal cancer patients within the first 2 years after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.