ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2017
Contemporary management of men with high-risk localized prostate cancer in the United States.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial disparities in prostate cancer mortality: a model-based decomposition of contributing factors.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023Article
- Comparison of Oncological Outcomes Between Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy by Type of Radiotherapy in Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Is the Field Ready Yet?European urology open science · 2020Review
- Role of MRI in planning radical prostatectomy: what is the added value?World journal of urology · 2019Review
- Impacts on functional and oncological outcomes of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy 10 years after the US Preventive Service Taskforce recommendations against PSA screening.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.5.
Identifiers
29125150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.