ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018
Melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy: A case report and differential diagnosis.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Radiologic diagnosis of non-traumatic paediatric head and neck emergencies.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy arising from the skull: report of an unusual case, review of the literature, and a diagnostic approach.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy is an uncommon pigmented neoplasm of neural crest origin. It was first described in 1918 by Krompecher, known as congenital melanocarcinoma at that time. Although it is generally agreed upon that it is a benign entity, it is locally aggressive and has a significant recurrent risk, reported to be between 10-15%. There have also been prior reports of malignant behaviour in these tumours, although extremely rare. The majority of cases of this tumour (about 70%) arise from the maxilla and its occurrence in the cranial vault represents approximately 15.6% of cases. We describe a rare case of melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy, with simultaneous involvement of the cranial vault and petrous temporal bone, in a four-month-old child, complicated by post-surgical pseudo-meningocele. This case illustrates the diagnostic dilemma in differentiating reactive osseous sclerosis from direct tumour infiltration, both of which can occur in the context of melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy. The discussion places emphasis on differential diagnoses and useful radiological features to assist in clinching the diagnosis of melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.