Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124326›Full record

ArticlePlanta2018

Impact of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Arundo donax L. response to salt stress.

Susanna Pollastri, Andreas Savvides, Massimo Pesando, Erica Lumini, Maria Grazia Volpe, Elif Aylin Ozudogru, Antonella Faccio, Fausta De Cunzo, Marco Michelozzi, Maurizio Lambardi and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of twoPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Susanna PollastriThe National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), 10125 Turin (M.P., E.L., A.F., R.B.), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, SP, Italy.
Andreas SavvidesCyprus University of Technology (CUT), Limassol, Cyprus.
Massimo PesandoThe National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), 10125 Turin (M.P., E.L., A.F., R.B.), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, SP, Italy.
Erica LuminiThe National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), 10125 Turin (M.P., E.L., A.F., R.B.), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, SP, Italy.
Maria Grazia VolpeCNR, Institute of Food Sciences, Avellino, Italy.
Elif Aylin OzudogruCNR, Institute of Trees and Timber (IVALSA), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Antonella FaccioThe National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), 10125 Turin (M.P., E.L., A.F., R.B.), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, SP, Italy.
Fausta De CunzoCNR, Institute of Food Sciences, Avellino, Italy.
Marco MichelozziCNR, Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Maurizio LambardiCNR, Institute of Trees and Timber (IVALSA), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Vasileios FotopoulosCyprus University of Technology (CUT), Limassol, Cyprus.
Francesco LoretoCNR, Department of Biology, Agriculture and Food Sciences (DiSBA), Rome, Italy.
Mauro CentrittoCNR, Institute of Trees and Timber (IVALSA), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Raffaella BalestriniThe National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), 10125 Turin (M.P., E.L., A.F., R.B.), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, SP, Italy. raffaella.balestrini@ipsp.cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-7681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionAM symbiosis did not strongly affect Arundo donax performances under salt stress, although differences in the plants inoculated with two different fungi were recorded. The mechanisms at the basis of the improved tolerance to abiotic stresses by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have been investigated mainly focusing on food crops. In this work, the potential impact of AM symbiosis on the performance of a bioenergy crop, Arundo donax, under saline conditions was considered. Specifically, we tried to understand whether AM symbiosis helps this fast-growing plant, often widespread in marginal soils, withstand salt. A combined approach, involving eco-physiological, morphometric and biochemical measurements, was used and the effects of two different AM fungal species (Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus irregularis) were compared. Results indicate that potted A. donax plants do not suffer permanent damage induced by salt stress, but photosynthesis and growth are considerably reduced. Since A. donax is a high-yield biomass crop, reduction of biomass might be a serious agronomical problem in saline conditions. At least under the presently experienced growth conditions, and plant-AM combinations, the negative effect of salt on plant performance was not rescued by AM fungal colonization. However, some changes in plant metabolisms were observed following AM-inoculation, including a significant increase in proline accumulation and a trend toward higher isoprene emission and higher H

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalBiomassChlorophyllMycorrhizaePlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant TranspirationPoaceaeSalinitySoilWaterChlorophyllSoilWaterAM symbiosisBioenergy cropClimate changeGiant reedPlant toleranceSalinity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.