Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124307›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: a critical evaluation.

Floor Hugenholtz, Willem M de Vos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04898621 (The Effect of Dietary Fructose on Gut Microbiota and Hepatosteatosis in Healthy Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 335 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
335citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04898621 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Dietary Fructose on Gut Microbiota and Hepatosteatosis in Healthy Men

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled58ConditionsHepatic Steatosis, Dietary Fructose ExposureArms75g fructose solution, 150g fructose solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

335 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 559 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Formic acid released by intratumoralActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The MOF-Microbiome Axis: a New Paradigm for Precision Nanomedicine.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026
    Review
  19. Gut microbiota remodeling inZoological research · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

275 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Floor HugenholtzLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, Building 124, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Willem M de VosLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, Building 124, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands. willem.devos@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early days of the intestinal microbiota research, mouse models have been used frequently to study the interaction of microbes with their host. However, to translate the knowledge gained from mouse studies to a human situation, the major spatio-temporal similarities and differences between intestinal microbiota in mice and humans need to be considered. This is done here with specific attention for the comparative physiology of the intestinal tract, the effect of dietary patterns and differences in genetics. Detailed phylogenetic and metagenomic analysis showed that while many common genera are found in the human and murine intestine, these differ strongly in abundance and in total only 4% of the bacterial genes are found to share considerable identity. Moreover, a large variety of murine strains is available yet most of the microbiota research is performed in wild-type, inbred strains and their transgenic derivatives. It has become increasingly clear that the providers, rearing facilities and the genetic background of these mice have a significant impact on the microbial composition and this is illustrated with recent experimental data. This may affect the reproducibility of mouse microbiota studies and their conclusions. Hence, future studies should take these into account to truly show the effect of diet, genotype or environmental factors on the microbial composition.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, TransgenicResearchSpecies SpecificityDietMetagenomeMicrobiomeMurine modelsPhylogenyReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID29124307
PMCPMC5752736
OpenAlexW2767590364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.