Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124290›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2018

Predicting psychiatric readmission: sex-specific models to predict 30-day readmission following acute psychiatric hospitalization.

Lucy Church Barker, Andrea Gruneir, Kinwah Fung, Nathan Herrmann, Paul Kurdyak, Elizabeth Lin, Paula A Rochon, Dallas Seitz, Valerie H Taylor, Simone N Vigod

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucy Church BarkerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea GruneirInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Kinwah FungInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Nathan HerrmannDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paul KurdyakDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Elizabeth LinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paula A RochonInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Dallas SeitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Valerie H TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Simone N VigodDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. simone.vigod@wchospital.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsychiatric readmission is a common negative outcome. Predictors of readmission may differ by sex. This study aimed to derive and internally validate sex-specific models to predict 30-day psychiatric readmission.

methodsWe used population-level health administrative data to identify predictors of 30-day psychiatric readmission among women (n = 33,353) and men (n = 32,436) discharged from all psychiatric units in Ontario, Canada (2008-2011). Predictor variables included sociodemographics, health service utilization, and clinical characteristics. Using derivation data sets, multivariable logistic regression models were fit to determine optimal predictive models for each sex separately. Results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The multivariable models were then applied in the internal validation data sets.

resultsThe 30-day readmission rates were 9.3% (women) and 9.1% (men). Many predictors were consistent between women and men. For women only, personality disorder (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.42) and positive symptom score (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82 for score of 1 vs. 0; aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.64 for ≥ 2 vs. 0) increased odds of readmission. For men only, self-care problems at admission (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36) and discharge (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.26-1.64 for score of 1 vs. 0; aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.17-2.74 for 2 vs. 0), and mild anxiety rating (score of 1 vs. 0: aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.64, derivation model only) increased odds of readmission. Models had moderate discriminative ability in derivation and internal validation samples for both sexes (c-statistics 0.64-0.65).

conclusionsCertain key predictors of psychiatric readmission differ by sex. This knowledge may help to reduce psychiatric hospital readmission rates by focusing interventions.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleHospitals, PsychiatricHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioOntarioPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPersonality DisordersPsychiatric epidemiologyPsychiatric readmissionSex-based analysisSex differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.