Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124241›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2017

US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.

Glen Gejerman, Patrick Ciccone, Martin Goldstein, Vincent Lanteri, Burton Schlecker, John Sanzone, Michael Esposito, Sergey Rome, Michael Ciccone, Eric Margolis and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Increasing aggressive prostate cancer.The Canadian journal of urology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prostate Cancer Incidence and Aggressiveness in Appalachia versus Non-Appalachia Populations in Pennsylvania by Urban-Rural Regions, 2004-2014.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prostate Cancer Screening in Brazil: a single center experience in the public health system.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Glen GejermanNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Patrick CicconeNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Martin GoldsteinNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Vincent LanteriNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Burton SchleckerNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
John SanzoneNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Michael EspositoNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Sergey RomeNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Michael CicconeNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Eric MargolisNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Robert SimonNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Yijun GuoNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Sri-Ram PentakotaDivision of Urology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Bloomfield, NJ, USA.
Hossein Sadeghi-NejadNew Jersey Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact that the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening guidelines have had on the diagnosis of prostate cancer, we compared the incidence and distribution of new cases diagnosed in 2011-before the USPSTF PSA screening recommendations versus 2014 at which time the guidelines were widely adopted. Materials and Methods: We identified all prostate biopsies performed by a large urology group practice utilizing a centralized pathology lab. We examined total biopsies performed, percentage of positive biopsies, and for those with positive biopsies examined for differences in patient age, PSA, and Gleason score. Results: A total of 4,178 biopsies were identified - 2,513 in 2011 and 1,665 in 2014. The percentage of positive biopsies was 27% in 2011 versus 34% in 2014 (p<0.0001). Among patients with positive biopsies, we found statistically significant differences between the 2 cohorts in the median ages and Gleason scores. Patients were about 1 year younger in 2014 compared to 2011 (t-test; p=0.043). High Gleason scores (8-10) were diagnosed in 19% of the 2014 positive biopsies versus 9% in the 2011 positive biopsies (chi square; p<0.0001). Conclusions: After the widespread implementation of the 2011 USPTF PSA screening guidelines, 34% fewer biopsies were performed with a 29% increase in positive biopsy rates. We found a significantly higher incidence of high grade disease in 2014 compared with 2011. The percentage of patients with positive biopsies having Gleason scores 8-10 more than doubled in 2014. The higher incidence of these more aggressive cancers must be part of the discussion regarding PSA screening.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiopsyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityProstate-Specific AntigenDiagnosisGleason scoreProstate neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29124241
PMCPMC5671961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.