Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124225›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2015

Novel curcumin derivatives as potent inhibitors of amyloid β aggregation.

Daijiro Yanagisawa, Hiroyasu Taguchi, Shigehiro Morikawa, Tomoko Kato, Koichi Hirao, Nobuaki Shirai, Ikuo Tooyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effectiveness of Novel Drug Delivery System using Curcumin in Alzheimer's Disease.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neem Derivatives Inhibits Tau Aggregation.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2019
    Article
  14. WS-5 Extract ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  15. Targeting Amyloid Aggregation: An Overview of Strategies and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daijiro YanagisawaMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Hiroyasu TaguchiMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Shigehiro MorikawaMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Tomoko KatoMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Koichi HiraoNortheastern Industrial Research Center of Shiga Prefecture, 27-39 Mitsuya Motomachi, Nagahama 526-0024, Japan.
Nobuaki ShiraiIndustrial Research Center of Shiga Prefecture, 232 Kamitoyama, Ritto 520-3004, Japan.
Ikuo TooyamaMolecular Neuroscience Research Center, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu 520-2192, Japan.
Shiga University of Medical Science · JPIndustrial Research Institute of Shizuoka Prefecture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of abnormal amyloid β (Aβ) aggregation is considered to be a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent

Indexed as

AggregationAlzheimer's diseaseAmyloid βCurcumin

Identifiers

PMID29124225
PMCPMC5669405
OpenAlexW1949883682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.