Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Kazuhiro SakamakiDepartment of Animal Development and Physiology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Naoyuki IwabeDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Hiroaki IwataMulti-scale Research Center for Medical Science, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiBiotechnology Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo 135-0064, Japan.
Chiyo TakagiDepartment of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Kumiko ChibaDepartment of Animal Development and Physiology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Chisa ShukunamiDepartment of Cellular Differentiation, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kentaro TomiiBiotechnology Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo 135-0064, Japan.
Naoto UenoDepartment of Developmental Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPNational Institute for Basic Biology · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPKyushu University · JP
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP, gene symbol
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Conservation of structure and function in vertebrate c-FLIP proteins despite rapid evolutionary change. · full record | OpenQuestion