ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2017
Toward common mechanisms for risk factors in Alzheimer's syndrome.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Salivary lactoferrin as biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: Brain-immunity interactions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Pooled it
- Decoding microglial immunometabolism: a new frontier in Alzheimer's disease research.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Fast Declining Prediction in Alzheimer's Disease from Early Clinical Assessment.Current neuropharmacology · 2025Observational
- Advanced Overview of Biomarkers and Techniques for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Brain Renin-Angiotensin System as Novel and Potential Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group.The Lancet. Neurology · 2021Review
- A Multimodal Risk Network Predicts Executive Function Trajectories in Non-demented Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Potentials in Alzheimer's Disease Management: A Mini Review.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Protective Factors Modulate the Risk of Beta Amyloid in Alzheimer's Disease.Behavioural neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global strategic goal of reducing health care cost, especially the prospects for massive increases due to expanding markets for health care services demanded by aging populations and/or people with a wide range of chronic disorders-disabilities, is a complex and formidable challenge with many facets. Current projections predict marked increases in the demand for health driven by both the exponential climb in the prevalence of chronic disabilities and the increases in the absolute numbers of people in need of some form of health care. Thus, the looming predicament for the economics of health care systems worldwide mandates the formulation of a strategic goal to foster significant expansion of global R&D efforts to discover and develop wide-ranging interventions to delay and/or prevent the onset of chronic disabling conditions. The rationale for adopting such a tactical objective is based on the premise that the costs and prevalence of chronic disabling conditions will be reduced by half even if a modest delay of 5 years in the onset of disability is obtained by a highly focused multinational research initiative. Because of the recent history of many failures in drug trials, the central thesis of this paper is to argue for the exploration-adoption of novel mechanistic ideas, theories, and paradigms for developing wide range and/or types of interventions. Although the primary focus of our discussion has been on biological approaches to therapy, we recognize the importance of emerging knowledge on nonpharmacological interventions and their potential impact in reducing health care costs. Although we may not find a drug to cure or prevent dementia for a long time, research is starting to demonstrate the potential contributes of nonpharmacological interventions toward the economics of health care in terms of rehabilitation, promoting autonomy, and potential to delay institutionalization, thus promoting healthy aging and reductions in the cost of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.