ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2017
Demineralized Bone Matrix to Augment Tendon-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM) in Tendon Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Single cell atlas decodes the molecular dynamics of scar repair after human rotator cuff tear.Bone research · 2026Article
- High Return to Activity and Low Rerupture Rates Following All-Inside Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone Marrow Aspirate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Augmentation.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation With Interpositional Demineralized Bone Fiber Implant.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Does the addition of demineralized bone matrix to fixation of acute comminuted clavicle fractures affect healing outcomes?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Augmentation Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repairs.JBJS reviews · 2025Review
- Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation With Interpositional Demineralized Bone Fiber Implant.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of Platelet-Rich Osteoconductive-Osteoinductive Allograft Compound on Tunnel Widening of ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Blind Analysis Study.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022Article
- Biomechanical properties of a suture anchor system from human allogenic mineralized cortical bone matrix for rotator cuff repair.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is Biological Augmentation Beneficial?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Biomimetic strategies for tendon/ligament-to-bone interface regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Ribbon-Like Graft With a C-Shaped Tibial Bone Tunnel.Arthroscopy techniques · 2020Article
- Therapeutic potential of exosomes in rotator cuff tendon healing.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing injury to the rotator cuff and anterior cruciate ligament, a direct enthesis is not regenerated, and healing occurs with biomechanically inferior fibrous tissue. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is a collagen scaffold that contains growth factors and is a promising biological material for tendon and ligament repair because it can regenerate a direct fibrocartilaginous insertion via endochondral ossification. PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review of the literature investigating the use of DBM to augment tendon-bone healing in tendon repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). STUDY
designSystematic review.
methodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated the use of DBM in tendon repair and ACLR. Search terms included the following: ("demineralized bone matrix" OR "demineralized cortical bone") AND ("tissue scaffold" OR "tissue engineering" OR "ligament" OR "tendon" OR "anterior cruciate ligament" OR "rotator cuff"). Peer-reviewed articles written in English were included, and no date restriction was applied (searches performed February 10, 2017). Methodological quality was assessed with peer-reviewed scoring criteria.
resultsThe search strategy identified 339 articles. After removal of duplicates and screening according to inclusion criteria, 8 studies were included for full review (tendon repair, n = 4; ACLR, n = 4). No human clinical studies were identified. All 8 studies were preclinical animal studies with good methodological quality. Five studies compared DBM augmentation with non-DBM controls, of which 4 (80%) reported positive findings in terms of histological and biomechanical outcomes.
conclusionPreclinical evidence indicates that DBM can improve tendon-bone healing, although clinical studies are lacking. A range of animal models of tendon repair and ACLR showed that DBM can re-create a direct fibrocartilaginous enthesis, although the animal models are not without limitations. Before clinical trials are justified, research is required that determines the best source of DBM (allogenic vs xenogenic) and the best form of DBM (demineralized cortical bone vs DBM paste) to be used in them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.