Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29124078›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2017

Demineralized Bone Matrix to Augment Tendon-Bone Healing: A Systematic Review.

Adam T Hexter, Catherine Pendegrass, Fares Haddad, Gordon Blunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does the addition of demineralized bone matrix to fixation of acute comminuted clavicle fractures affect healing outcomes?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Arthroscopy techniques · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advances in Stem Cell Therapies for Rotator Cuff Injuries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic potential of exosomes in rotator cuff tendon healing.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam T HexterInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Middlesex, UK.
Catherine PendegrassInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Middlesex, UK.
Fares HaddadUniversity College Hospital, London, UK.
Gordon BlunnInstitute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Middlesex, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing injury to the rotator cuff and anterior cruciate ligament, a direct enthesis is not regenerated, and healing occurs with biomechanically inferior fibrous tissue. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is a collagen scaffold that contains growth factors and is a promising biological material for tendon and ligament repair because it can regenerate a direct fibrocartilaginous insertion via endochondral ossification. PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review of the literature investigating the use of DBM to augment tendon-bone healing in tendon repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). STUDY

designSystematic review.

methodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated the use of DBM in tendon repair and ACLR. Search terms included the following: ("demineralized bone matrix" OR "demineralized cortical bone") AND ("tissue scaffold" OR "tissue engineering" OR "ligament" OR "tendon" OR "anterior cruciate ligament" OR "rotator cuff"). Peer-reviewed articles written in English were included, and no date restriction was applied (searches performed February 10, 2017). Methodological quality was assessed with peer-reviewed scoring criteria.

resultsThe search strategy identified 339 articles. After removal of duplicates and screening according to inclusion criteria, 8 studies were included for full review (tendon repair, n = 4; ACLR, n = 4). No human clinical studies were identified. All 8 studies were preclinical animal studies with good methodological quality. Five studies compared DBM augmentation with non-DBM controls, of which 4 (80%) reported positive findings in terms of histological and biomechanical outcomes.

conclusionPreclinical evidence indicates that DBM can improve tendon-bone healing, although clinical studies are lacking. A range of animal models of tendon repair and ACLR showed that DBM can re-create a direct fibrocartilaginous enthesis, although the animal models are not without limitations. Before clinical trials are justified, research is required that determines the best source of DBM (allogenic vs xenogenic) and the best form of DBM (demineralized cortical bone vs DBM paste) to be used in them.

Indexed as

ACLbiologic healing enhancementdemineralized bone matrixdemineralized cortical bonerotator cufftendon-bone healing

Identifiers

PMID29124078
PMCPMC5661670
OpenAlexW2765188614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.