Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123926›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2017

Spinal Excitability Changes after Transspinal and Transcortical Paired Associative Stimulation in Humans.

Maria Knikou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04624607 (Transspinal-Transcortical Paired Stimulation for Neuroplasticity and Recovery After SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04624607 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Transspinal-Transcortical Paired Stimulation for Neuroplasticity and Recovery After SCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorCollege of Staten Island, the City University of New YorkRan2018 to 2020Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Spinal, Tetraplegia/TetraparesisArmsTransspinal-transcortical paired-associative stimiulation combined with robotic gait training, Transcortical-transspinal paired-associative stimiulation combined with robotic gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria KnikouKlab4Recovery, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island, New York, NY 10314, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-236X
The Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) produces enduring neuroplasticity based on Hebbian associative plasticity. This study established the changes in spinal motoneuronal excitability by pairing transcortical and transspinal stimulation. Transcortical stimulation was delivered after (transspinal-transcortical PAS) or before (transcortical-transspinal PAS) transspinal stimulation. Before and after 40 minutes of each PAS protocol, spinal neural excitability was assessed based on the amplitude of the transspinal-evoked potentials (TEPs) recorded from ankle muscles of both legs at different stimulation intensities (recruitment input-output curve). Changes in TEPs amplitude in response to low-frequency stimulation and paired transspinal stimuli were also established before and after each PAS protocol. TEP recruitment input-output curves revealed a generalized depression of TEPs in most ankle muscles of both legs after both PAS protocols that coincided with an increased gain only after transcortical-transspinal PAS. Transcortical-transspinal PAS increased and transspinal-transcortical PAS decreased the low-frequency-dependent TEP depression, whereas neither PAS protocol affected the TEP depression observed upon paired transspinal stimuli. These findings support the notion that transspinal and transcortical PAS has the ability to alter concomitantly cortical and spinal synaptic activity. Transspinal and transcortical PAS may contribute to the development of rehabilitation strategies in people with bilateral increased motoneuronal excitability due to cortical or spinal lesions.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAdultElectric StimulationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalNeural PathwaysPyramidal TractsSpinal CordTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29123926
PMCPMC5662837
OpenAlexW2765424365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.