ArticleAcute medicine & surgery2017
Do not attempt resuscitation order in Japan.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age modifies the prognostic relevance of extracellular water-to-total body water ratio in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation against patients' "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" orders in community settings in Japan: A narrative review.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2024Review
- Public Attitude towards Implementing DNAR and a Stance on Pediatric DNAR in Poland-A Prospective Survey Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Knowledge and attitudes of physicians in Chile toward Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation orders: A cross-sectional nation-wide study.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- The Vicissitude of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Order During COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Conditions in Turkey: Current Status of Code Blue.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2021Article
- Realizing the Wishes of Terminal Patients: Caregiving Transport Efforts for End of Life in the Kuji Area of Japan.Palliative medicine reports · 2021Article
- ICMR Consensus Guidelines on 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation'.The Indian journal of medical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: In Japan, the do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) order is practised routinely even though no related laws or guidelines exist. This study aimed to clarify the current status of DNAR, reveal existing DNAR-related issues, and improve the application of DNAR. Methods: A questionnaire survey of medical institutions in Kanagawa Prefecture (total population, 9,120,000) about the current status of DNAR was carried out. Results: The results showed that DNAR has been practised at approximately 90% of the hospitals surveyed, but only about 30% have developed in-hospital DNAR guidelines. Approximately 80% of the hospitals do not involve patients in the decision on their own DNAR orders. Because the DNAR order has not been legislated, it is often unclear whether to resuscitate patients when a request for an ambulance is made for a cardiac arrest at home. Conclusion: It is necessary for prefectures, municipalities, and local medical control authorities to take the initiative in establishing an ordinance on DNAR orders and developing guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.