Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123789›Full record

ReviewAcute medicine & surgery2016

The retroperitoneal interfascial planes: current overview and future perspectives.

Kazuo Ishikawa, Shota Nakao, Makoto Nakamuro, Tai-Ping Huang, Hiroshi Nakano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acute medicine & surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Solid Primary Retroperitoneal Masses in Adults: An Imaging Approach.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Zoning inside the renal fascia: The anatomical relationship between the urinary system and perirenal fat.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2020
    Article
  14. Radiological classification of retroperitoneal hematoma resulting from lumbar vertebral fracture.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kazuo IshikawaDepartment of Surgery Seikeikai Hospital Minami-Yasuicho Sakai-ku Sakai-shi Osaka Japan.
Shota NakaoSenshu Trauma and Critical Care Center Rinku General Medical Center Rinku-Ourai-KitaIzumisano-shi Osaka Japan.
Makoto NakamuroDepartment of Surgery Seikeikai Hospital Minami-Yasuicho Sakai-ku Sakai-shi Osaka Japan.
Tai-Ping HuangDepartment of Surgery Seikeikai Hospital Minami-Yasuicho Sakai-ku Sakai-shi Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi NakanoDepartment of Surgery Seikeikai Hospital Minami-Yasuicho Sakai-ku Sakai-shi Osaka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the concept of interfascial planes has become the prevalent theory among radiologists for understanding the retroperitoneal anatomy, having replaced the classic tricompartmental theory. However, it is a little known fact that the concept remains incomplete and includes embryological errors, which have been revised on the basis of our microscopic study. We believe that the concept not only provides a much clearer understanding of the retroperitoneal anatomy, but it also allows further development for diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal injuries and diseases, should it become an accomplished theory. We explain the history and outline of the concept of interfascial planes, correct common misunderstandings about the concept, explain the unconsciously applied therapeutic procedures based on the concept, and present future perspectives of the concept using our published and unpublished data. This knowledge could be essential to acute care physicians and surgeons sometime soon.

Indexed as

Embryologyinterfascial planesretroperitoneumsepsis/multiple organ failuretrauma

Identifiers

PMID29123789
PMCPMC5667245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.