Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123681›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2017

Lifetimes and spatio-temporal response of protein crystals in intense X-ray microbeams.

Matthew A Warkentin, Hakan Atakisi, Jesse B Hopkins, Donald Walko, Robert E Thorne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Snapshots of Internal Protein Crystal Architecture at the Nanoscale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Radiation damage and dose limits in serial synchrotron crystallography at cryo- and room temperatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A WarkentinPhysics Department, Cornell University, Clark Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Hakan AtakisiPhysics Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Jesse B HopkinsCornell High Energy Synchrotron Source, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Donald WalkoAdvanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.
Robert E ThornePhysics Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USArgonne National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial synchrotron-based crystallography using intense microfocused X-ray beams, fast-framing detectors and protein microcrystals held at 300 K promises to expand the range of accessible structural targets and to increase overall structure-pipeline throughputs. To explore the nature and consequences of X-ray radiation damage under microbeam illumination, the time-, dose- and temperature-dependent evolution of crystal diffraction have been measured with maximum dose rates of 50 MGy s

Indexed as

intense X-ray microbeamsmicrocrystallographyprotein crystallographyprotein structureradiation damageserial crystallographystructural biologystructure determinationX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID29123681
PMCPMC5668864
OpenAlexW2762540719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.