Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123672›Full record

ReviewIUCrJ2017

The science is in the data.

John R Helliwell, Brian McMahon, J Mitchell Guss, Loes M J Kroon-Batenburg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUCrJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Raw diffraction data and reproducibility.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Making your raw data available to the macromolecular crystallography community.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic Structural Biology Experiments at XFEL or Synchrotron Sources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Findable Accessible Interoperable Re-usable (FAIR) diffraction data are coming to protein crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of applied crystallography · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John R HelliwellSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-7540
Brian McMahonInternational Union of Crystallography, 5 Abbey Square, Chester CH1 2HU, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0391-0002
J Mitchell GussSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-6079
Loes M J Kroon-BatenburgCrystal and Structural Chemistry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, CH 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding published research results should be through one's own eyes and include the opportunity to work with raw diffraction data to check the various decisions made in the analyses by the original authors. Today, preserving raw diffraction data is technically and organizationally viable at a growing number of data archives, both centralized and distributed, which are empowered to register data sets and obtain a preservation descriptor, typically a 'digital object identifier'. This introduces an important role of preserving raw data, namely understanding where we fail in or could improve our analyses. Individual science area case studies in crystallography are provided.

Indexed as

crystallographic science case studieseducationopen scienceraw diffraction datasharing raw data and its reuse

Identifiers

PMID29123672
PMCPMC5668855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.