A prospective cohort study on comparison of early outcome of classical Ponseti and modified Ponseti post tenotomy in clubfoot management.

introductionPonseti method has become the main treatment modality for the management of clubfoot producing good long-term results. However, variation in cast application post tenotomy has not been evaluated.

methodsA prospective cohort study involving 40 patients with 67 clubfeet were randomized into two groups: 32 above knee cast (AKC) and 35 below knee cast (BKC) after percutaneous tenotomy. All had foot abduction brace after post tenotomy cast. The median age was 21 weeks (range: 1-104 weeks) and 1.9:1 male/female ratio. 27 (67.5%) patients had bilateral clubfoot and unilateral in 13 (32.5%). Patients were followed-up for 6 months with documentation of the Pirani Score and the cost of treatment.

resultsNo significant difference between AKC and BKC mean Pirani score before treatment (p = 0.550) and after treatment (p = 0.702). However, mean Pirani score at 6 months was significantly different (p = 0.038). Overall mean number of casting was 6.4 in AKC group and 4.7 in BKC group (p = 0.003). There was recurrence in 2 feet before completion of treatment (6.3%) among AKC and none among BKC group. However, there was no recurrence at 6 months after treatment in both groups. The mean cost for AKC and BKC were ₦10,427.34 (52.33 US dollars) and ₦7021.54 (35.24 US dollars) respectively (p = 0.002).

conclusionEarly results of below knee cast after tenotomy were comparable to the classical above knee cast after tenotomy in Ponseti treatment protocol for clubfoot. There was also reduction in cost of treatment in the modified Ponseti compared to the classical Ponseti. Long-term result will be desirable.