ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
Ready or not? Pharmacist perceptions of a changing injection scope of practice before it happens.
Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare providers' awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and practices surrounding pharmacist-administered vaccination: Insights after a two-year intervention.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- StaffWISE project part 1: Exploring the connection between burnout, staffing, and patient safety in the literature.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2025Article
- Healthcare provider awareness, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding the role of pharmacists as immunizers.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- The Federal Retail Pharmacy Program (FRPP) Impact on COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution During Pandemic: Effectiveness, Limitations, and Implications.Innovations in pharmacy · 2022Article
- Travel Medicine Curricula across Canadian Pharmacy Programs and Alignment with Scope of Practice.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Uptake of Travel Health Services by Community Pharmacies and Patients Following Pharmacist Immunization Scope Expansion in Ontario, Canada.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Pharmacy travel health services: current perspectives and future prospects.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2017Review
- Making it happen: Strategies to incorporate vaccinations into community pharmacy practice.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
- Pharmacists' immunization experiences, beliefs, and attitudes in New Brunswick, Canada.Pharmacy practiceArticle
- Canadian Pharmacists Conference 2017 pharmacy practice research highlights.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2012, Ontario pharmacists have been authorized to administer the influenza vaccine. In April 2016, the Ontario College of Pharmacists (OCP) proposed to expand the Pharmacy Act to allow pharmacists to vaccinate against 13 additional conditions. The OCP held an online public consultation and invited pharmacists, members of the public and organizations to weigh in on the proposed changes. Our objective was to explore the factors influencing how Ontario pharmacists may adopt or reject an expanding scope of practice, using data from the public consultation.
methodsWe coded the responses to the public consultation in 2 ways: 1) sentiment analysis and 2) an integrative approach to coding using Rogers's diffusion of innovations theory across 5 domains: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability.
resultsResponses from pharmacists, the public and organizations were moderately positive on average. Pharmacists most commonly mentioned relative advantages, including benefits for patients, pharmacists, physicians and the health system. Positive responses focused on accessibility for patients, improved vaccine coverage, lower health care spending and freed physician time but cited lack of prescribing privileges as a barrier to the proposed changes. Negative responses focused on increased workload, patient safety concerns and the complexity of travel medicine.
conclusionsThe expanded immunization services are likely to be well received by most pharmacists. Convenience and accessibility for patients were commonly cited benefits, but the changes will be only a slight improvement over the current system unless pharmacists can prescribe these vaccines. Although employers responded positively, the question remains whether they will support pharmacists in a way that aligns with pharmacists' values and expectations. Decision makers must pay close attention to the pharmacy infrastructure and how this will affect uptake of these services. Recognition of this, combined with pharmacists' positive perceptions of the expanded scope, will facilitate smooth integration of this legislation into Ontario pharmacy practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.