Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2017

A magnetically responsive nanocomposite scaffold combined with Schwann cells promotes sciatic nerve regeneration upon exposure to magnetic field.

Zhongyang Liu, Shu Zhu, Liang Liu, Jun Ge, Liangliang Huang, Zhen Sun, Wen Zeng, Jinghui Huang, Zhuojing Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhongyang Liu *Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Shu Zhu *Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Liang Liu *Department of Orthopedics, No 161 Hospital of PLA, Wuhan, Hubei.
Jun Ge *Department of Orthopedics, No 323 Hospital of PLA, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Liangliang HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Zhen SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Wen ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Jinghui HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Zhuojing LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve repair is still challenging for surgeons. Autologous nerve transplantation is the acknowledged therapy; however, its application is limited by the scarcity of available donor nerves, donor area morbidity, and neuroma formation. Biomaterials for engineering artificial nerves, particularly materials combined with supportive cells, display remarkable promising prospects. Schwann cells (SCs) are the absorbing seeding cells in peripheral nerve engineering repair; however, the attenuated biologic activity restricts their application. In this study, a magnetic nanocomposite scaffold fabricated from magnetic nanoparticles and a biodegradable chitosan-glycerophosphate polymer was made. Its structure was evaluated and characterized. The combined effects of magnetic scaffold (MG) with an applied magnetic field (MF) on the viability of SCs and peripheral nerve injury repair were investigated. The magnetic nanocomposite scaffold showed tunable magnetization and degradation rate. The MGs synergized with the applied MF to enhance the viability of SCs after transplantation. Furthermore, nerve regeneration and functional recovery were promoted by the synergism of SCs-loaded MGs and MF. Based on the current findings, the combined application of MGs and SCs with applied MF is a promising therapy for the engineering of peripheral nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsChitosanGlycerophosphatesMagnetic FieldsMaleNanocompositesNerve RegenerationPolymersRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionSchwann CellsSciatic NerveTissue ScaffoldsTransplantation, AutologousChitosanGlycerophosphatesPolymersfunctional recoverymagnetic fieldmagnetic nanoparticlenanocompositeperipheral nerve repairSchwann cell

Identifiers

PMID29123395
PMCPMC5661463
OpenAlexW2766035507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.