Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123382›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2017

In vivo study of doxorubicin-loaded cell-penetrating peptide-modified pH-sensitive liposomes: biocompatibility, bio-distribution, and pharmacodynamics in BALB/c nude mice bearing human breast tumors.

Yuan Ding, Wei Cui, Dan Sun, Gui-Ling Wang, Yu Hei, Shuai Meng, Jian-Hua Chen, Ying Xie, Zhi-Qiang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Liposome-FeAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Peptide-functionalized liposomes as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for cancer treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan Ding *Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Wei Cui *School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
Dan SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Gui-Ling WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Yu HeiBeijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Shuai MengBeijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Jian-Hua ChenSchool of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Ying XieBeijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery Systems, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University.
Zhi-Qiang WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University Geauga, Burton, OH, USA.
Peking University · CNJianghan University · CNKent State University Geauga · USUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo evaluation of drug delivery vectors is essential for clinical translation. In BALB/c nude mice bearing human breast cancer tumors, we investigated the biocompatibility, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded novel cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-modified pH-sensitive liposomes (CPPL) (referred to as CPPL(DOX)) with an optimal CPP density of 4%. In CPPL, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivative formed by conjugating PEG with stearate via acid-degradable hydrazone bond (PEG2000-Hz-stearate) was inserted into the surface of liposomes, and CPP was directly attached to liposome surfaces via coupling with stearate to simultaneously achieve long circulation time in blood and improve the selectivity and efficacy of CPP for tumor targeting. Compared to PEGylated liposomes, CPPL enhanced DOX accumulation in tumors up to 1.9-fold (

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCell-Penetrating PeptidesDoxorubicinDrug CarriersFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLiposomesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudePolyethylene GlycolsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCell-Penetrating PeptidesDoxorubicinDrug CarriersLiposomesPolyethylene Glycolshemolysispharmacokineticstherapy for breast cancertumor targetingTUNEL stain

Identifiers

PMID29123382
PMCPMC5661853
OpenAlexW2766213446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.