Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123258›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Prognostic impact and concordance of TERT promoter mutation and protein expression in matched primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Emilia Hugdahl, May Britt Kalvenes, Monica Mannelqvist, Rita G Ladstein, Lars A Akslen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Utility and Micro-Costing Framework forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical Activity of Combined Telomerase Vaccination and Pembrolizumab in Advanced Melanoma: Results from a Phase I Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  15. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. New Insights into Melanoma Tumor Syndromes.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilia HugdahlCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5021, Norway.
May Britt KalvenesCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5021, Norway.
Monica MannelqvistCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5021, Norway.
Rita G LadsteinCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5021, Norway.
Lars A AkslenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen 5021, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTERT promoter mutations are frequent in melanoma. Here we analysed the concordance and prognostic impact of TERT mutation and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) protein expression in a large melanoma series.

methodsIn 194 primary nodular melanomas with 72 matched loco-regional metastases, TERT promoter mutation status was assessed by Sanger sequencing and TERT protein expression by immunohistochemistry.

resultsTERT mutations were found in 68% of primary melanomas and 64% of metastases, and the mutation status was discordant between primary tumour and metastasis in 24% of the cases. 6 of the 10 cases with discordant and wild-type metastases were also TERT wild type when re-tested in other intra-tumour regions, whereas 4 cases were mutation positive. TERT-mutated tumours tended to be thicker, have a higher mitotic count and higher patient age than TERT wild-type cases, but there was no significant association with reduced survival. TERT protein expression did not correlate with mutation status, but showed a similar discordancy between the primary and first metastatic lesion, and was significantly associated with reduced survival.

conclusionsTERT promoter mutations showed inter- and intra-tumoural discordancy, whereas only expression of TERT protein was associated with reduced patient survival.

Indexed as

MutationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTelomeraseTissue Array AnalysisTelomeraseTERT protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29123258
PMCPMC5765228
OpenAlexW2767678733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.