Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123256›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Favourable prognostic role of histological regression in stage III positive sentinel lymph node melanoma patients.

D Zugna, R Senetta, S Osella-Abate, M T Fierro, A Pisacane, A Zaccagna, A Sapino, V Bataille, A Maurichi, F Picciotto and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of melanoma histological regression on first-line immunotherapy response in stage-IV disease.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Histological regression in melanoma: impact on sentinel lymph node status and survival.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

D ZugnaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, CERMS, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
R SenettaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Surgical Pathology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
S Osella-AbateDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Surgical Pathology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
M T FierroDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
A PisacanePathology Unit, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia (FPO), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCS), Km 3,95, SP142, 10060 Candiolo, Torino Italy.
A ZaccagnaDermatologic Surgery Section, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia (FPO), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCS), Km 3,95, SP142, 10060 Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
A SapinoPathology Unit, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia (FPO), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IRCCS), Km 3,95, SP142, 10060 Candiolo, Torino Italy.
V BatailleMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood HA6 2RN, UK.
A MaurichiMelanoma and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
F PicciottoDermatologic Surgery Section, Department of Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Cherasco 23, 10123 Torino, Italy.
P CassoniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Surgical Pathology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
P QuaglinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.
S RiberoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti, 14, Torino 10126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma patients are a heterogeneous group of patients with survival rates ranging from ∼20 to over 80%. No data are reported concerning the role of histological regression on survival in stage III melanoma.

methodsThe study included 365 patients with positive SLN from two distinct hospitals. The model was developed on patients from 'AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino', and externally validated on patients from IRCCS of Candiolo. Survival analyses were carried out according to the presence of regression and adjusted for all other prognostic factors.

resultsAmong patients followed at 'AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' (n=264), the median follow-up time to death or censoring (whatever two events occurred earlier) was 2.7 years since diagnosis (interquartile range: 1.3-5.8). In all, 79 patients died from melanoma and 11 from other causes. Histological regression (n=43) was associated with a better prognosis (sub-HR=0.34, CI 0.12-0.92), whereas the other factors above showed an inverse association. In the external validation, the concordance index was 0.97 at 1 year and decreased to 0.66 at 3 years and to 0.59 at 5 years. Adding histological regression in the prognostic model increased the discriminative ability to 0.75 at 3 years and to 0.62 at 5 years. Finally, using a cutoff of 20% for the risk of death led to a net re-classification improvement of 15 and 11% at 3 and 5 years after diagnosis, respectively.

conclusionsHistological regression could lead to an improvement in prognostic prediction in patients with stage III-positive SLN melanoma.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSentinel Lymph NodeSkin NeoplasmsSkin UlcerSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID29123256
PMCPMC5808022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.