Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29123238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Reconstructing Yeasts Phylogenies and Ancestors from Whole Genome Data.

Bing Feng, Yu Lin, Lingxi Zhou, Yan Guo, Robert Friedman, Ruofan Xia, Fei Hu, Chao Liu, Jijun Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bing FengCollege of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, PR China.
Yu LinCollege of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Lingxi ZhouDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Yan GuoCenter for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Robert FriedmanDepartment of Biological Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Ruofan XiaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Fei HuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Chao LiuCollege of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, PR China. lcpku@126.com.
Jijun TangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. jtang@cse.sc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-536X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic studies aim to discover evolutionary relationships and histories. These studies are based on similarities of morphological characters and molecular sequences. Currently, widely accepted phylogenetic approaches are based on multiple sequence alignments, which analyze shared gene datasets and concatenate/coalesce these results to a final phylogeny with maximum support. However, these approaches still have limitations, and often have conflicting results with each other. Reconstructing ancestral genomes helps us understand mechanisms and corresponding consequences of evolution. Most existing genome level phylogeny and ancestor reconstruction methods can only process simplified real genome datasets or simulated datasets with identical genome content, unique genome markers, and limited types of evolutionary events. Here, we provide an alternative way to resolve phylogenetic problems based on analyses of real genome data. We use phylogenetic signals from all types of genome level evolutionary events, and overcome the conflicting issues existing in traditional phylogenetic approaches. Further, we build an automated computational pipeline to reconstruct phylogenies and ancestral genomes for two high-resolution real yeast genome datasets. Comparison results with recent studies and publications show that we reconstruct very accurate and robust phylogenies and ancestors. Finally, we identify and analyze the conserved syntenic blocks among reconstructed ancestral genomes and present yeast species.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalPhylogenyComputational BiologyYeasts

Identifiers

PMID29123238
PMCPMC5680185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.