Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122850›Full record

ArticleGut2018

Differential preventive activity of sulindac and atorvastatin in Apc

Wen-Chi L Chang, Christina Jackson, Stacy Riel, Harry S Cooper, Karthik Devarajan, Harvey H Hensley, Yan Zhou, Lisa A Vanderveer, Minhhuyen T Nguyen, Margie L Clapper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Suppression of Colon Tumorigenesis in MutantCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The application of ApcJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Wen-Chi L ChangCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christina JacksonCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stacy RielCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Harry S CooperCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karthik DevarajanBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Harvey H HensleyBiological Imaging Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yan ZhouBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lisa A VanderveerCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Minhhuyen T NguyenDepartment of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Margie L ClapperCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USNational Imaging Facility · AU

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Colonoscopic Analysis of Response of Murine Colon Lesions to Drug Intervention R21CA129467 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI CLAPPER, MARGIE L. · 2007 to 2008
$376k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA129467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe response of subjects to preventive intervention is heterogeneous. The goal of this study was to determine if the efficacy of a chemopreventive agent differs in non-tumour-bearing animals versus those with colorectal tumours. Sulindac and/or atorvastatin was administered to Apc

designMale mice (6-8 weeks old) underwent colonoscopy and received control chow or chow with sulindac (300 ppm), atorvastatin (100 ppm) or sulindac/atorvastatin. Tissues were collected from mice treated for 14 weeks (histopathology) or 7 days (gene expression). Cell cycle analyses were performed on SW480 colon carcinoma cells treated with sulindac, atorvastatin or both.

resultsThe multiplicity of colorectal adenomas in untreated mice bearing tumours at baseline was 3.6-fold higher than that of mice that were tumour free at baseline (P=0.002). Atorvastatin completely inhibited the formation of microadenomas in mice that were tumour free at baseline (P=0.018) and altered the expression of genes associated with stem/progenitor cells. Treatment of tumour-bearing mice with sulindac/atorvastatin led to a 43% reduction in the multiplicity of colorectal adenomas versus untreated tumour-bearing mice (P=0.049). Sulindac/atorvastatin increased the expression of

conclusionsThe tumour status of animals at treatment initiation dictates response to therapeutic intervention. Atorvastatin eliminated microadenomas in tumour-free mice. The tumour inhibition observed with Sul/Atorva in tumour-bearing mice was greater than that achieved with each agent.

Indexed as

AdenomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAtorvastatinColorectal NeoplasmsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiceSulindacAntineoplastic AgentsAtorvastatinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSulindaccancer preventioncolonoscopycolorectal adenomasfamilial adenomatous polyposis

Identifiers

PMID29122850
PMCPMC6031273
OpenAlexW2767628584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.