Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122794›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Consensus validation of the POSAMINO (POtentially Serious Alcohol-Medication INteractions in Older adults) criteria.

Alice E Holton, Paul J Gallagher, Cristín Ryan, Tom Fahey, Gráinne Cousins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structured medication reviews: origins, implementation, evidence, and prospects.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  13. Alcohol consumption and risk of cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding in patients with established atrial fibrillation.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice E HoltonSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland.
Paul J GallagherSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland.
Cristín RyanSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland.
Tom FaheyDivision of Population Health Science, HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-5783
Gráinne CousinsSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOlder adults are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects from concurrent alcohol and medication use. However, there is limited evidence regarding the prevalence of these adverse outcomes among older adults, and there is a lack of consensus regarding what constitutes an alcohol-interactive medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an explicit list of potentially serious alcohol-medication interactions for use in older adults.

designFollowing a systematic review, review of drug compendia and clinical guidance documents, a two-round Delphi consensus method was conducted.

settingIreland and the United Kingdom (UK), primary care and hospital setting.

participantsThe Project Steering Group developed a list of potentially serious alcohol-medication interactions. The Delphi panel consisted of 19 healthcare professionals (general practitioners, geriatricians, hospital and community pharmacists, clinical pharmacologists and pharmacists, and physicians specialising in substance misuse).

resultsAn inventory of 52 potentially serious alcohol-medication interactions was developed by the Project Steering Group. British National Formulary black dot warnings (n=8) were included in the final criteria as they represent 'potentially serious' interactions. The remaining 44 criteria underwent a two-round Delphi process. In the first round, 13 criteria were accepted into the POtentially Serious Alcohol-Medication INteractions in Older adults (POSAMINO) criteria. Consensus was not reached on the remaining 31 criteria; 9 were removed and 8 additional criteria were included following a review of panellist comments. The remaining 30 criteria went to round 2, with 17 criteria reaching consensus, providing a final list of 38 potentially serious alcohol-medication interactions: central nervous system (n=15), cardiovascular system (n=9), endocrine system (n=5), musculoskeletal system (n=3), infections (n=3), malignant disease and immunosuppression (n=2), and respiratory system (n=1).

conclusionsPOSAMINO is the first set of explicit potentially serious alcohol-medication interactions for use in older adults. Following future validation studies, these criteria may allow for the risk stratification of older adults at the point of prescribing.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsEthanolPrescription DrugsPrimary Health CareAgedConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansIrelandRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomEthanolPrescription Drugsadverse eventsalcoholclinical pharmacologygeriatric medicine

Identifiers

PMID29122794
PMCPMC5695415
OpenAlexW2767209649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.