Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122792›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Understanding the implementation of 'sick day guidance' to prevent acute kidney injury across a primary care setting in England: a qualitative evaluation.

Anne-Marie Martindale, Rebecca Elvey, Susan J Howard, Sheila McCorkindale, Smeeta Sinha, Tom Blakeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Managing 'sick days' in patients with chronic conditions: An exploration of patient and healthcare provider experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Acute kidney injury and 'nephrotoxins': mind your language.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Marie MartindaleNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-3424
Rebecca ElveyNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Susan J Howard
Sheila McCorkindaleNHS Salford Clinical Commissioning Group, Salford, UK.
Smeeta SinhaSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Tom BlakemanNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study sought to examine the implementation of sick day guidance cards designed to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI), in primary care settings.

designQualitative semistructured interviews were conducted and comparative analysis informed by normalisation process theory was undertaken to understand sense-making, implementation and appraisal of the cards and associated guidance.

settingA single primary care health setting in the North of England.

participants29 participants took part in the qualitative evaluation: seven general practitioners, five practice nurses, five community pharmacists, four practice pharmacists, two administrators, one healthcare assistant and five patients.

interventionThe sick day guidance intervention was rolled out (2015-2016) in general practices (n=48) and community pharmacies (n=60). The materials consisted of a 'medicine sick day guidance' card, provided to patients who were taking the listed drugs. The card provided advice about medicines management during episodes of acute illness. An information leaflet was provided to healthcare practitioners and administrators suggesting how to use and give the cards.

resultsImplementation of sick day guidance cards to prevent AKI entailed a new set of working practises across primary care. A tension existed between ensuring reach in administration of the cards to at risk populations while being confident to ensure patient understanding of their purpose and use. Communicating the concept of temporary cessation of medicines was a particular challenge and limited their administration to patient populations at higher risk of AKI, particularly those with less capacity to self-manage.

conclusionsSick day guidance cards that focus solely on medicines management may be of limited patient benefit without adequate resourcing or if delivered as a standalone intervention. Development and evaluation of primary care interventions is urgently warranted to tackle the harm associated with AKI.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Education as TopicAcute Kidney InjuryAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalEnglandGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicPharmaciesPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalacute kidney injurypatient safetypreventive medicineprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID29122792
PMCPMC5695520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.