Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122785›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong and Xuesaitong capsules for treating stroke: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Huiling Chen, Hongbo Cao, Xu Guo, Meidan Zhao, Qing Xia, Bo Chen, Tieniu Zhao, Wenyuan Gao

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huiling ChenSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-6024
Hongbo CaoTianjin Institute of Clinical Evaluation, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Xu GuoSchool of Language and Culture, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Meidan ZhaoCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Qing XiaCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Bo ChenCollege of Acupuncture and Massage, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Tieniu ZhaoSchool of Chinese Medical, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Wenyuan GaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAfter stroke, hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis can manifest during the convalescent period. Currently, no Chinese patent medicine (CPM) is previously reported to cure each of these symptoms primarily, and thus, there are no relevant instructions for the use of CPM. This study presents a new approach based on comparative effectiveness research to distinguish the curative effects of three CPMs that are often used in stroke convalescence to determine the ideal medicine for the treatment of each symptom. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre and double-blind clinical trial, stratified randomisation is used to group the patients according to their primary symptoms (hemiplegia, dysphasia and facial paralysis). Three strata will be enrolled, with 80 eligible participants included in each stratum. Each stratum will be randomly and equally divided into four groups, and each group will receive one of the following treatments: Naoxuekang, Xinnaoshutong (XNST), Xuesaitong (XST) or placebo. This study will include two stages: the initial treatment period (30 days) and a follow-up period (180 days). Three replicates for each data point will be completed during this trial. The first visit will occur on day 0 after enrolment, the second visit on day 30±2 and the third visit on day 210±5. The Delphi technique is adopted to achieve index weighting, which ensures that the evaluation outcome is patient oriented. The weighted index value will be computed as the final measurement index of the outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (registration number TJUTCM-EC20160007). The results will be offered for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-17010397). The date of registration was 11 January 2017.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyAdultAgedCapsulesChinaComparative Effectiveness ResearchDouble-Blind MethodDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNonprescription DrugsResearch DesignSaponinsStrokeCapsulesDrugs, Chinese HerbalNonprescription DrugsSaponinsxuesetongclinical trialscomplementary medicineherbal medicinestrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID29122785
PMCPMC5695516
OpenAlexW2767851343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.