Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122722›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Stimulus-invariant auditory cortex threat encoding during fear conditioning with simple and complex sounds.

Matthias Staib, Dominik R Bach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Threat Memory Reminder Under Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Inhibitor Doxycycline Globally Reduces Subsequent Memory Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias StaibDivision of Clinical Psychiatry Research, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Centre Zurich, 8057, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik R BachDivision of Clinical Psychiatry Research, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Centre Zurich, 8057, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychsosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1 3BG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: dominik.bach@uzh.ch.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 149586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to predict threat depends on amygdala plasticity and does not require auditory cortex (ACX) when threat predictors (conditioned stimuli, CS) are simple sine tones. However, ACX is required in rodents to learn from some naturally occurring CS. Yet, the precise function of ACX, and whether it differs for different CS types, is unknown. Here, we address how ACX encodes threat predictions during human fear conditioning using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with multivariate pattern analysis. As in previous rodent work, CS+ and CS- were defined either by direction of frequency modulation (complex) or by frequency of pure tones (simple). In an instructed non-reinforcement context, different sets of simple and complex sounds were always presented without reinforcement (neutral sounds, NS). Threat encoding was measured by separation of fMRI response patterns induced by CS+/CS-, or similar NS1/NS2 pairs. We found that fMRI patterns in Heschl's gyrus encoded threat prediction over and above encoding the physical stimulus features also present in NS, i.e. CS+/CS- could be separated better than NS1/NS2. This was the case both for simple and complex CS. Furthermore, cross-prediction demonstrated that threat representations were similar for simple and complex CS, and thus unlikely to emerge from stimulus-specific top-down, or learning-induced, receptive field plasticity. Searchlight analysis across the entire ACX demonstrated further threat representations in a region including BA22 and BA42. However, in this region, patterns were distinct for simple and complex sounds, and could thus potentially arise from receptive field plasticity. Strikingly, across participants, individual size of Heschl's gyrus predicted strength of fear learning for complex sounds. Overall, our findings suggest that ACX represents threat predictions, and that Heschl's gyrus contains a threat representation that is invariant across physical stimulus categories.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingConditioning, ClassicalFearFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAuditory cortexFear conditioningFunctional MRI (fMRI)Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA)Threat prediction

Identifiers

PMID29122722
PMCPMC5770332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.