Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122721›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

A common periodic representation of interaural time differences in mammalian cortex.

Nelli H Salminen, Simon J Jones, Gestur B Christianson, Torsten Marquardt, David McAlpine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nelli H SalminenBrain and Mind Laboratory, Dept. of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, MEG Core, Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland. Electronic address: nelli.salminen@aalto.fi.
Simon J JonesUCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
Gestur B ChristiansonUCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
Torsten MarquardtUCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
David McAlpineUCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK; Dept of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Gray's InnUniversity College London · GBAalto University · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binaural hearing, the ability to detect small differences in the timing and level of sounds at the two ears, underpins the ability to localize sound sources along the horizontal plane, and is important for decoding complex spatial listening environments into separate objects - a critical factor in 'cocktail-party listening'. For human listeners, the most important spatial cue is the interaural time difference (ITD). Despite many decades of neurophysiological investigations of ITD sensitivity in small mammals, and computational models aimed at accounting for human perception, a lack of concordance between these studies has hampered our understanding of how the human brain represents and processes ITDs. Further, neural coding of spatial cues might depend on factors such as head-size or hearing range, which differ considerably between humans and commonly used experimental animals. Here, using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in human listeners, and electro-corticography (ECoG) recordings in guinea pig-a small mammal representative of a range of animals in which ITD coding has been assessed at the level of single-neuron recordings-we tested whether processing of ITDs in human auditory cortex accords with a frequency-dependent periodic code of ITD reported in small mammals, or whether alternative or additional processing stages implemented in psychoacoustic models of human binaural hearing must be assumed. Our data were well accounted for by a model consisting of periodically tuned ITD-detectors, and were highly consistent across the two species. The results suggest that the representation of ITD in human auditory cortex is similar to that found in other mammalian species, a representation in which neural responses to ITD are determined by phase differences relative to sound frequency rather than, for instance, the range of ITDs permitted by head size or the absolute magnitude or direction of ITD.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAuditory CortexElectrocorticographyFemaleGuinea PigsHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePsychoacousticsSound LocalizationTime FactorsYoung AdultAuditory cortexGuinea pigHumanInteraural time differenceMagnetoencephalographySound source localization

Identifiers

PMID29122721
PMCPMC5854251
OpenAlexW2767523068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.