Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122548›Full record

ReviewSteroids2018

Experimental models for evaluating non-genomic estrogen signaling.

Megan L Stefkovich, Yukitomo Arao, Katherine J Hamilton, Kenneth S Korach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Steroids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Sex as a biological variable: Mechanistic insights and clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Sex-dependent dysregulation of human neutrophil responses by bisphenol A.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Auditory function and dysfunction: estrogen makes a difference.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  19. Achieving CLARITY on bisphenol A, brain and behaviour.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2020
    Review
  20. Molecular Signaling Regulating Endometrium-Blastocyst Crosstalk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan L StefkovichReceptor Biology Section, Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, NIEHS, 111 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Yukitomo AraoReceptor Biology Section, Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, NIEHS, 111 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Katherine J HamiltonReceptor Biology Section, Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, NIEHS, 111 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Kenneth S KorachReceptor Biology Section, Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, NIEHS, 111 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: korach@niehs.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Chemical Receptor Interactions In Reproduction And Hormonal ToxicityZIAES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 2009 to 2019
$29.6M
NIEHS Knock Out Mouse Core (KOMC) Annual ReportZICES102425 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAY, MANAS · 2010 to 2025
$20.1M
Chemical Receptor Interactions Reproduction/HormonalZ01ES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 1985 to 2008
$5.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES070065Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES070065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-genomic effects of estrogen receptor α (ERα) signaling have been described for decades. However, the mechanisms and physiological processes resulting solely from non-genomic signaling are poorly understood. Challenges in studying these effects arise from the strongly nucleophilic tendencies of estrogen receptor, and many approaches to excluding ERα from the nucleus have been explored over the years. In this review, we discuss past strategies for studying ERα's non-genomic action and current models, specifically H2NES ERα, first described by Burns et al. (2011). In vitro and preliminary in vivo data from H2NES ERα and H2NES mice suggest a promising avenue for pinpointing specific non-genomic ERα action.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalSignal TransductionAnimalsEstrogensHumansEstrogensEstrogen receptor alphaNon-genomic signalingRapid action

Identifiers

PMID29122548
PMCPMC5864539
OpenAlexW2767752220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.