Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29122104›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2017

The Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Heart Disease.

Christian Albus, Jörg Barkhausen, Eckart Fleck, Jörg Haasenritter, Oliver Lindner, Sigmund Silber

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Current Clinical Practice Is Different.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
  20. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christian AlbusDepartment of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital (UK-SH), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Society of Cardiology (DGK), DGK Capital Office, Berlin, Germany; Philipps University Marburg, Department of General Medicine, Preventive and Rehabilitative Medicine, Marburg, Germany; Institute of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Heart and Diabetes Center NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany; Cardiology Practice, Munich, Germany.
Jörg Barkhausen
Eckart Fleck
Jörg Haasenritter
Oliver Lindner
Sigmund Silber
University of Lübeck · DEMünchen Klinik · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic coronary heart disease (CHD) and acute myocardial infarction are endemic conditions. In Germany, an estimated 900 000 cardiac catheterizations were performed in the year 2014, and a percutaneous intervention was carried out in 40% of these procedures. It would be desirable to lessen the number of invasive diagnostic procedures while preserving the reliability of diagnosis. In this article, we present the updated recommendations of the German National Care Guideline for Chronic CHD with regard to diagnostic evaluation.

methodsUpdated recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation of chronic CHD were developed on the basis of existing guidelines and a systematic literature review and approved by a formal consensus process.

results8-11% of patients with chest pain who present to a general practitioner and 20-25% of those who present to a cardiologist have chronic CHD. General practitioners should estimate the probability of CHD with the Marburg Heart Score. Specialists can use detailed tables for determining the pre-test probability of CHD; if this lies in the range of 15% to 85%, then non-invasive tests should be primarily used for evaluation and treatment planning. If the pretest probability is less than 15%, other potential causes should be ruled out first. If it is over 85%, the presence of CHD should be presumed and treatment planning should be initiated. Coronary angiography is needed only if therapeutic implications are expected (revascularization). Psychosocial risk factors for the development and course of CHD and the patient's quality of life should be regularly assessed as well.

conclusionNon-invasive testing and invasive coronary angiography should be used only if their findings are expected to have therapeutic implications. Psychosocial risk factors, the quality of life, and adherence to treatment are important components of these patients' diagnostic evaluation and long-term care.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary DiseaseFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29122104
PMCPMC5686296
OpenAlexW2801783113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.