Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29121999›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2017

Improving adherence in mental health service users with severe mental illness in South Africa: a pilot randomized controlled trial of a treatment partner and text message intervention vs. treatment as usual.

Goodman Sibeko, Henk Temmingh, Sumaya Mall, Peter Williams-Ashman, Graham Thornicroft, Ezra S Susser, Crick Lund, Dan J Stein, Peter D Milligan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic Adherence of People with Mental Disorders: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Goodman SibekoDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. goodmansibeko@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-0878
Henk TemminghDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sumaya MallDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Peter Williams-AshmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Graham ThornicroftInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ezra S SusserColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.
Crick LundDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Dan J SteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Peter D MilliganDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedication non-adherence is a significant problem in treatment of severe mental disorders and is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased demand on services. Task-shifting interventions incorporating mobile health may improve adherence in mental health service users in low- and middle-income countries. Seventy-seven participants were recruited from a psychiatric hospital in Cape Town, with 42 randomized to receive the intervention and 35 to treatment as usual. Intervention pairs underwent treatment-partner contracting and psychoeducation, and received monthly text message reminders of clinic appointments. Primary outcomes were intervention acceptability and feasibility. Secondary outcome for efficacy were adherence to clinic visit; relapse; quality of life; symptomatic relief and medication adherence.

resultsTreatment partner and psychoeducation components were acceptable and feasible. The text message component was acceptable but not feasible in its current form. Efficacy outcomes favoured the intervention but did not reach statistical significance. A treatment-partner intervention is acceptable and feasible in a low- and middle-income setting. Work is needed to ensure that additional components of such interventions are tailored to the local context. Appropriately powered efficacy studies are needed. Trial Registration PACTR PACTR201610001830190, Registered 21 October 2016 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceMental Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CareReminder SystemsText MessagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsPsychotherapySouth AfricaAdherenceMental healthMobile healthTask-shiftingText messageTreatment partner

Identifiers

PMID29121999
PMCPMC5679373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.