ArticleBMC genomics2017
A systematic survey to identify lethal recessive variation in highly managed pig populations.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining crossover count and position in two pig lines with different selection histories.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants associated with single-parity reproductive loss in three commercial pig breeds.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Host-Microbiota Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Porcine Fetal Mummification.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- The effects of runs-of-homozygosity on pig domestication and breeding.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Massive detection of cryptic recessive genetic defects in dairy cattle mining millions of life histories.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Identification of SNPs and Candidate Genes Associated with Monocyte/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Duroc × Erhualian FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Effects of inbreeding on reproductive success in endangered North Atlantic right whales.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Purifying and balancing selection on embryonic semi-lethal haplotypes in a wild mammal.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a horse reference panel for genotype imputation.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Four novel candidate causal variants for deficient homozygous haplotypes in Holstein cattle.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Investigation of the Genetic Architecture of Pigs Subjected to Breeding Intensification.Genes · 2022Article
- Mining massive genomic data of two Swiss Braunvieh cattle populations reveals six novel candidate variants that impair reproductive success.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Reverse Genetic Screen for Deleterious Recessive Variants in the Local Simmental Cattle Population of Switzerland.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Identification of homozygous haplotypes carrying putative recessive lethal mutations that compromise fertility traits in French Lacaune dairy sheep.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Characterization of a haplotype-reference panel for genotyping by low-pass sequencing in Swiss Large White pigs.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- A Missense Mutation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Breeding for resilience: new opportunities in a modern pig breeding program.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Article
- Removal of alleles by genome editing (RAGE) against deleterious load.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Analysis of a large dataset reveals haplotypes carrying putatively recessive lethal and semi-lethal alleles with pleiotropic effects on economically important traits in beef cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLethal recessive variation can cause prenatal death of homozygous offspring. Although usually present at low-frequency in populations, the impact on individual fitness can be substantial. Until recently, the presence of recessive embryonic lethal variation could only be measured indirectly through reduced fertility. In this study, we estimate the presence of genetic loci associated with both early and late termination of development during gestation in pigs from the wealth of genome data routinely generated by a commercial breeding company.
resultsWe examined three commercial pig (Sus scrofa) populations for potentially deleterious genetic variation based on 80 K SNP-chip genotypes, and estimate the effects on reproductive traits. 24,000 pigs from three populations were analyzed for missing or depletion of homozygous haplotypes. We identified 145 haplotypes (ranging from 0.5-4 Mb in size) in the genome with complete absence or depletion of homozygous animals. Thirty-five haplotypes show a negative effect on at least one of the analysed reproductive traits (total number born, number of stillborn, and number of mummified piglets). One variant in particular appeared to result in relative late termination of development of fetuses, responsible for a significant fraction of observed stillborn piglets ('mummies'), as they die mid-gestation. Moreover, we identified the BMPER gene as a likely candidate underlying this phenomenon.
conclusionsOur study shows that although lethal recessive variation is present, the frequency of these alleles is invariably low in these highly managed populations. Nevertheless, due to cumulative effects of deleterious variants, large numbers of affected offspring are produced. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the use of a large-scale commercial genetic experiment to systematically screen for 'natural knockouts' that can increase understanding of gene function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.