Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29121857›Full record

SynthesisBMC genomics2017

Meta-analysis of sequence-based association studies across three cattle breeds reveals 25 QTL for fat and protein percentages in milk at nucleotide resolution.

Hubert Pausch, Reiner Emmerling, Birgit Gredler-Grandl, Ruedi Fries, Hans D Daetwyler, Michael E Goddard

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Characteristics and Polymorphisms of Buffalo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hubert PauschAnimal Genomics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. hubert.pausch@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-6760
Reiner EmmerlingInstitute of Animal Breeding, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, 85586, Grub, Germany.
Birgit Gredler-GrandlQualitasAG, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Ruedi FriesAnimal Breeding, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Hans D DaetwylerAgriculture Research Division, Agriculture Victoria, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Michael E GoddardAgriculture Research Division, Agriculture Victoria, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, AgriBio, VIC, 3083, Australia.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PA2789/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotyping and whole-genome sequencing data have been generated for hundreds of thousands of cattle. International consortia used these data to compile imputation reference panels that facilitate the imputation of sequence variant genotypes for animals that have been genotyped using dense microarrays. Association studies with imputed sequence variant genotypes allow for the characterization of quantitative trait loci (QTL) at nucleotide resolution particularly when individuals from several breeds are included in the mapping populations.

resultsWe imputed genotypes for 28 million sequence variants in 17,229 cattle of the Braunvieh, Fleckvieh and Holstein breeds in order to compile large mapping populations that provide high power to identify QTL for milk production traits. Association tests between imputed sequence variant genotypes and fat and protein percentages in milk uncovered between six and thirteen QTL (P < 1e-8) per breed. Eight of the detected QTL were significant in more than one breed. We combined the results across breeds using meta-analysis and identified a total of 25 QTL including six that were not significant in the within-breed association studies. Two missense mutations in the ABCG2 (p.Y581S, rs43702337, P = 4.3e-34) and GHR (p.F279Y, rs385640152, P = 1.6e-74) genes were the top variants at QTL on chromosomes 6 and 20. Another known causal missense mutation in the DGAT1 gene (p.A232K, rs109326954, P = 8.4e-1436) was the second top variant at a QTL on chromosome 14 but its allelic substitution effects were inconsistent across breeds. It turned out that the conflicting allelic substitution effects resulted from flaws in the imputed genotypes due to the use of a multi-breed reference population for genotype imputation.

conclusionsMany QTL for milk production traits segregate across breeds and across-breed meta-analysis has greater power to detect such QTL than within-breed association testing. Association testing between imputed sequence variant genotypes and phenotypes of interest facilitates identifying causal mutations provided the accuracy of imputation is high. However, true causal mutations may remain undetected when the imputed sequence variant genotypes contain flaws. It is highly recommended to validate the effect of known causal variants in order to assess the ability to detect true causal mutations in association studies with imputed sequence variants.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAnimalsBase SequenceCattleGenotypeMilkMilk ProteinsNucleotidesQuantitative Trait LociMilk ProteinsNucleotidesCattleDairy traitsMeta-analysisQtlSequence imputation

Identifiers

PMID29121857
PMCPMC5680815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.