Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29121221›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2018

Short atrioventricular delay pacing therapy in young and old patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: good long-term results and a low need for reinterventions.

Davood Javidgonbadi, Nils-Johan Abdon, Bert Andersson, Maria Schaufelberger, Ingegerd Östman-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Davood JavidgonbadiDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5B, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nils-Johan AbdonFormerly Department of Medicine, Uddevalla Hospital, Fjällvägen 9, Uddevalla, Sweden (retired).
Bert AnderssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5B, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria SchaufelbergerDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Blå stråket 5B, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ingegerd Östman-SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Rondvägen 10, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Examination of long-term results following different treatments in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) in a complete geographical cohort. Methods and results: HOCM patients attending during 2002-13 in all 10 hospitals in the West Götaland Region, Sweden, were identified (n = 251), follow-up 14.4 (±8.9) years (mean ± SD), 121 managed medically, 42 treated with myectomy and 88 with short atrioventricular (AV) delay pacing as first interventional procedure. Post-intervention follow-up was 12.9 ± 8.7 years and 12.2 ± 5.0 years, respectively. Both intervention treatments improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and outflow gradients significantly. Patients treated with pacing were older (median age 64 vs. 43 years, P < 0.001). Freedom from disease-related death post-procedure at 5, 10, and 20 years were 93%, 80%, 56% vs. 93%, 93%, 57% in pacing and myectomy groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.43). Survival after diagnosis was not different in patients just treated conservatively (P = 0.51 pacing/conservative; P = 0.39 myectomy/conservative). Reintervention for outflow gradients in patients ≥18 years at procedure occurred in 3.5% in pacing group and 15.6% in myectomy group (P = 0.007). Pacing therapy was equally effective in patients aged 13-64 years (n = 44), as in patients ≥65 years (n = 44): resting gradient pre-procedure and at last follow-up were median (IQR) 65 (71) and 12 (20) mmHg for <65 year-olds (P < 0.001), and 75 (64) and 14 (38) mmHg, respectively, for ≥65 year-olds (P < 0.001). New York Heart Association class improved significantly in both age ranges to 1.6 ± 0.6 and 1.8 ± 0.7, respectively (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Short AV delay pacing provided lasting satisfactory relief of symptoms and outflow obstruction in the majority of patients, with low risk of requiring reintervention. Our findings support the view that pacing therapy should be considered a valid option to treat patients with HOCM.

Indexed as

Uterine MyomectomyAdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAge FactorsCalcium Channel BlockersCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicConservative TreatmentEchocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCalcium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID29121221
PMCPMC6182309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.