ArticlePloS one2017
Differences between racing and non-racing drivers: A simulator study using eye-tracking.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-hand coordination during robotic prostate cancer surgery - how surgical vision reflects on instrument kinematics and vice versa.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Psychomotor and Basic Cognitive Abilities in Professional Athletes: A Systematic Review.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Review
- The racer's gaze: Visual strategy in high-speed sports expertise.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- A Comparative Performance Analysis of Load Cell and Hall-Effect Brake Sensors in Sim Racing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Use of Extended Reality Technologies in Sport Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2024Article
- Effects of multimodal explanations for autonomous driving on driving performance, cognitive load, expertise, confidence, and trust.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Less Is More: Higher-Skilled Sim Racers Allocate Significantly Less Attention to the Track Relative to the Display Features than Lower-Skilled Sim Racers.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- An embodied and ecological approach to skill acquisition in racecar driving.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Application of a Reactive Agility Training Program Using Light-Based Stimuli to Enhance the Physical and Cognitive Performance of Car Racing Drivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Sports medicine - open · 2022Article
- Review
- Egocentric Chunking in the Predictive Brain: A Cognitive Basis of Expert Performance in High-Speed Sports.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Gaze Strategies in Driving-An Ecological Approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Theoretical interpretation of drivers' gaze strategy influenced by optical flow.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparing driving behavior of humans and autonomous driving in a professional racing simulator.PloS one · 2021Article
- Feasibility and Validity of a Low-Cost Racing Simulator in Driving Assessment after Stroke.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Relationship Between Cognition and Sensorimotor Behavior in an F1 Driving Simulation: An Explorative Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Saccades and driving.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2019Article
- Sensitive and Reliable Measures of Driver Performance in Simulated Motor-Racing.International journal of exercise science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motorsport has developed into a professional international competition. However, limited research is available on the perceptual and cognitive skills of racing drivers. By means of a racing simulator, we compared the driving performance of seven racing drivers with ten non-racing drivers. Participants were tasked to drive the fastest possible lap time. Additionally, both groups completed a choice reaction time task and a tracking task. Results from the simulator showed faster lap times, higher steering activity, and a more optimal racing line for the racing drivers than for the non-racing drivers. The non-racing drivers' gaze behavior corresponded to the tangent point model, whereas racing drivers showed a more variable gaze behavior combined with larger head rotations while cornering. Results from the choice reaction time task and tracking task showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Our results are consistent with the current consensus in sports sciences in that task-specific differences exist between experts and novices while there are no major differences in general cognitive and motor abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.