Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29121044›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Information-theoretic analysis of the directional influence between cellular processes.

Sourabh Lahiri, Philippe Nghe, Sander J Tans, Martin Luc Rosinberg, David Lacoste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoding collective communications using information theory tools.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sourabh LahiriGulliver laboratory, PSL Research University, ESPCI, 10 rue de Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Philippe NgheLaboratory of Biochemistry, PSL Research University, ESPCI, 10 rue de Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Sander J TansFOM Institute AMOLF, Science Park, 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin Luc RosinbergLaboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS UMR 7600, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.
David LacosteGulliver laboratory, PSL Research University, ESPCI, 10 rue de Vauquelin, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-4657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring the directionality of interactions between cellular processes is a major challenge in systems biology. Time-lagged correlations allow to discriminate between alternative models, but they still rely on assumed underlying interactions. Here, we use the transfer entropy (TE), an information-theoretic quantity that quantifies the directional influence between fluctuating variables in a model-free way. We present a theoretical approach to compute the transfer entropy, even when the noise has an extrinsic component or in the presence of feedback. We re-analyze the experimental data from Kiviet et al. (2014) where fluctuations in gene expression of metabolic enzymes and growth rate have been measured in single cells of E. coli. We confirm the formerly detected modes between growth and gene expression, while prescribing more stringent conditions on the structure of noise sources. We furthermore point out practical requirements in terms of length of time series and sampling time which must be satisfied in order to infer optimally transfer entropy from times series of fluctuations.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaInformation TheoryEntropyEscherichia coliIsopropyl ThiogalactosideMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalStochastic ProcessesIsopropyl Thiogalactoside

Identifiers

PMID29121044
PMCPMC5679622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.