Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29120491›Full record

SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2018

Clinical studies in CRS and HIPEC: Trials, tribulations, and future directions-A systematic review.

William F Morano, Marian Khalili, Dennis S Chi, Wilbur B Bowne, Jesus Esquivel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nanoparticle-Based Interventions for Liver Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William F MoranoDepartment of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-5221
Marian KhaliliDepartment of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dennis S ChiSection of Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Wilbur B BowneDepartment of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jesus EsquivelDepartment of Surgery, Frederick Memorial Hospital, Frederick, Maryland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has suffered from a lack of clinical trials to validate its expanding use.

objectiveTo evaluate published and ongoing clinical trials seeking to better define role of CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

methodsSystematic review by PubMed search was performed using terms "Clinical trial," "intraperitoneal chemotherapy," and "HIPEC." ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT registries were searched for active clinical trials. Eligibility included CRS/HIPEC trials investigating adult patient populations from published clinical reports and/or trials currently accruing or at completion.

resultsThirteen published trials and 57 active clinical trials were included for review.

conclusionsPublished and ongoing U.S. and international clinical trials for CRS and HIPEC are defining important parameters that include improving patient selection, strategic sequences of treatment, cytoreductive strategies, chemotherapeutics, optimal hyperthermic temperature and timing, and toxicity profiles. Main barriers or limitations to trial development remain patient enrollment, trial design, and oncologic community collaboration. Overall progress is positive with increasing number of clinical trials throughout the world. Collaboration between surgeons and the wider oncologic community will be crucial to validate this important treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionClinical Trials as TopicCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHyperthermia, InducedHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival Rateclinical trialscytoreductive surgeryHIPECperitoneal carcinomatosisperitoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID29120491
PMCPMC6692902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.