Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29120461›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of a germ-line mutation in POLE or POLD1.

Daniel D Buchanan, Jenna R Stewart, Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Khalid Mahmood, Bernard J Pope, Mark A Jenkins, John L Hopper, Melissa C Southey, Finlay A Macrae and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Hereditary colorectal cancer].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cancer Risks Associated WithJCO precision oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. [Hereditary colorectal carcinogenesis].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Unraveling the impact of a germline heterozygousFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Germline Variants ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment ofTranslational cancer research · 2022
    Article
  17. Evaluation of Classic, Attenuated, and Oligopolyposis of the Colon.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  18. How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel D BuchananColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. daniel.buchanan@unimelb.edu.au.
Jenna R StewartColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mark ClendenningColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Christophe RostyColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Khalid MahmoodColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Bernard J PopeColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mark A JenkinsCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
John L HopperCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Finlay A MacraeGenetic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ingrid M WinshipGenetic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Aung Ko WinCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Data sharing: the Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortU01CA167551 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI Daniel David BUCHANAN, Steven Gallinger · 2018 to 2026
$16.8M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: AustralasiaU24CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2008 to 2011
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U01 CA167551NCI NIH HHS U24 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGerm-line mutations in the exonuclease domains of the POLE and POLD1 genes are associated with an increased, but yet unquantified, risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsWe identified families with POLE or POLD1 variants by searching PubMed for relevant studies prior to October 2016 and by genotyping 669 population-based CRC cases diagnosed in patients under 60 years of age, from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry. We estimated the age-specific cumulative risks (penetrance) using a modified segregation analysis.

resultsWe observed 67 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 50.2 (SD = 13.8) years) among 364 first- and second-degree relatives from 41 POLE families, and 6 CRCs (mean age at diagnosis = 39.7 (SD = 6.83) years) among 69 relatives from 9 POLD1 families. We estimated risks of CRC up to the age of 70 years (95% confidence interval) for males and females, respectively, to be 28% (95% CI, 10–42%) and 21% (95% CI, 7–33%) for POLE mutation carriers and 90% (95% CI, 33–99%) and 82% (95% CI, 26–99%) for POLD1 mutation carriers.

conclusionCRC risks for POLE mutation carriers are sufficiently high to warrant consideration of colonoscopy screening and implementation of management guidelines recommended for MSH6 mutation carriers in cases of Lynch syndrome. Refinement of estimates of CRC risk for POLD1 carriers is needed; however, clinical management recommendations could follow those made for POLE carriers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPedigreePenetrancePoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsRiskDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIPOLD1 protein, humanPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteinscolorectal cancerpenetrancePOLD1POLEpolymerase proofreading–associated polyposis

Identifiers

PMID29120461
PMCPMC5943186
OpenAlexW2767950802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.