Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119981›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2017

Magnetic bead-based peptide extraction methodology for tissue imaging.

William T Andrews, Susan B Skube, Amanda B Hummon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Electroblotting through Enzymatic Membranes to Enhance Molecular Tissue Imaging.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  4. In situ metabolite and lipid analysis of GluN2DAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William T AndrewsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Harper Cancer Research Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. ahummon@nd.edu.
Susan B Skube
Amanda B Hummon

Funding

Spatial SILAC: Examining the Proteome in 3D Cell CulturesR01GM110406 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI HUMMON, AMANDA B. · 2014 to 2022
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MALDI-TOF imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a common technique used for analyzing tissue samples, as it allows the user to detect multiple different analytes simultaneously. However, the detection and analysis of these analytes may sometimes be hampered due to the presence of contaminants in the tissue microenvironment, which leads to ion suppression. This challenge necessitates the development of an active extraction technique to selectively isolate analytes of interest without compromising their spatial localization within a tissue sample. This study proposes a magnetic bead-based active extraction approach to selectively sequester peptides of interest from tissue samples. The technique utilizes a heterobifunctional cross-linker to covalently bind peptides with free primary amine groups to functionalized magnetic beads. The cross-linked peptides can then be collected using a transfer magnet and imaged using MALDI-TOF IMS. We have established that this technique not only successfully isolates peptides both in-solution and on a solid surface, but also extracts peptides from a tissue section without significantly compromising their spatial localization. This novel method provides the means to detect a unique subset of peptides from tissue sections when compared to unextracted tryptically digested tissue, all while minimizing the presence of contaminants and maintaining spatial localization.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnimalsBrainMagneticsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptidesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID29119981
PMCPMC5734995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.