Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119733›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B

Administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line compared with rapid bolus alleviates fentanyl-induced cough during general anesthesia induction.

Min-Qiang Liu, Feng-Xian Li, Ya-Kun Han, Jun-Yong He, Hao-Wen Shi, Li Liu, Ren-Liang He

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Qiang LiuInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Feng-Xian LiInstitute of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China.
Ya-Kun HanInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Jun-Yong HeInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Hao-Wen ShiInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Li LiuInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Ren-Liang HeInstitute of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Shenzhen 518112, China.
Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFentanyl-induced cough (FIC) is a common complication with a reported incidence from 18.0% to 74.4% during general anesthesia induction. FIC increases the intrathoracic pressure and risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting, yet available treatments are limited. This study was designed to investigate whether administering fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can effectively alleviate FIC during induction of total intravenous general anesthesia.

methodsA total number of 1200 patients, aged 18-64 years, were enrolled, all of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II undergoing scheduled surgeries. All patients received total intravenous general anesthesia, which was induced sequentially by midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and cisatracurium injection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl 3.5 μg/kg via direct injection (control group) or via a slow intravenous fluid line. FIC incidence and the severity grades were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. Other adverse reactions, such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypoxemia, vomiting, and aspiration, during induction were also observed. The online clinical registration number of this study was ChiCTR-IOR-16009025.

resultsCompared with the control group, the incidence of FIC was significantly lower in the slow intravenous fluid line group during induction (9.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7%-11.4% vs. 55.9%, 95% CI: 51.8%-60.0%, P=0.000), as were the severity grades (P=0.000). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with regard to other adverse reactions (P>0.05).

conclusionsThe administration of fentanyl via a slow intravenous fluid line can alleviate FIC and its severity during induction for total intravenous general anesthesia. This method is simple, safe, and reliable, and deserves clinical expansion.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumCoughFemaleFentanylHumansIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousAtracuriumcisatracuriumFentanylMidazolamPropofolGeneral anesthesia; Fentanyl-induced cough; Slow intravenous fluid line; Alleviate; Induction

Identifiers

PMID29119733
PMCPMC5696314
OpenAlexW2773228571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.