Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119723›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2018

Tick attachment cement - reviewing the mysteries of a biological skin plug system.

Johannes Suppan, Benedikt Engel, Martina Marchetti-Deschmann, Sylvia Nürnberger

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NETosis mediates tick blood pool formation.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Tick-Borne Encephalitis in the 21Le infezioni in medicina · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tick saliva and its role in pathogen transmission.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023
    Article
  18. Recent Advances in Tick Antigen Discovery and Anti-Tick Vaccine Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes SuppanDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Benedikt EngelInstitute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/164, A-1060, Vienna, Austria.
Martina Marchetti-DeschmannInstitute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/164, A-1060, Vienna, Austria.
Sylvia NürnbergerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-5118
Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATTU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of ticks in the family Ixodidae secrete a substance anchoring their mouthparts to the host skin. This substance is termed cement. It has adhesive properties and seals the lesion during feeding. The particular chemical composition and the curing process of the cement are unclear. This review summarizes the literature, starting with a historical overview, briefly introducing the different hypotheses on the origin of the adhesive and how the tick salivary glands have been identified as its source. Details on the sequence of cement deposition, the curing process and detachment are provided. Other possible functions of the cement, such as protection from the host immune system and antimicrobial properties, are presented. Histochemical and ultrastructural data of the intracellular granules in the salivary gland cells, as well as the secreted cement, suggest that proteins constitute the main material, with biochemical data revealing glycine to be the dominant amino acid. Applied methods and their restrictions are discussed. Tick cement is compared with adhesives of other animals such as barnacles, mussels and sea urchins. Finally, we address the potential of tick cement for the field of biomaterial research and in particular for medical applications in future.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsAnimalsArthropod ProteinsFeeding BehaviorHumansSalivary GlandsTicksArthropod ProteinsBiological Productsartificial feedingbioadhesivesblood feedingcement plugIxodidaesalivary glandsticks

Identifiers

PMID29119723
PMCPMC5947171
OpenAlexW2767489638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.