Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119619›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2018

Quantitative differentiation of whole smoke solution-induced mutagenicity in the mouse lymphoma assay.

Xiaoqing Guo, Robert H Heflich, Stacey L Dial, Mamata De, Patricia A Richter, Nan Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Benchmark Response (BMR) Values for In Vivo Mutagenicity Endpoints.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025
    Article
  2. Key Challenges forAlternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Benchmark Dose Modeling ofToxicological research · 2018
    Review
  5. Comparative Genotoxicity of TEMPO and 3 of Its Derivatives in Mouse Lymphoma Cells.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoqing GuoDivision of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas.
Robert H HeflichDivision of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas.
Stacey L DialDivision of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas.
Mamata DeCenter for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Patricia A RichterCenter for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Nan MeiDivision of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0002-3501-9014

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro genotoxicity dose-response data have been investigated for their utility in modeling and assessing potential differences in mutagenic responses between machine-generated whole smoke solutions (WSSs) from combusted cigarette tobacco products. Our previous study observed that potency ranking by benchmark dose (BMD) analysis was a useful modeling approach for quantitative assessment of differences between the mutagenicity of several structurally diverse chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. To follow-up on these observations, we used the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) to evaluate the mutagenicity of WSSs prepared from two commercial cigarettes smoked under two different smoking machine regimens. L5178Y cells were exposed to ≥5 concentrations of each WSS for 4 hr ± S9 activation. S9 reduced the cytotoxicity and enhanced the mutagenicity of the WSSs. The resulting S9-mediated mutagenicity dose-responses were compared between test articles using BMD analysis, the lowest dose exceeding the Global Evaluation Factor, the no observed or lowest observed genotoxic effect level, and the mutagenic potency. The BMD

Indexed as

AnimalsBenchmarkingCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCigarette SmokingHumansLymphomaMiceMutagenicity TestsNicotianabenchmark dosemouse lymphoma assayquantitative analysiswhole smoke solution

Identifiers

PMID29119619
PMCPMC8142256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.