ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017
An integrative approach to assess X-chromosome inactivation using allele-specific expression with applications to epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using combined RNA/DNA short read sequencing to investigate allele-specific expression from the inactive X chromosome in human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The impact of X chromosome inactivation on human health.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Quantification of escape from X chromosome inactivation with single-cell omics data reveals heterogeneity across cell types and tissues.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Integrating spatial transcriptomics and bulk RNA-seq: predicting gene expression with enhanced resolution through graph attention networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Identification of skewed X chromosome inactivation using exome and transcriptome sequencing in patients with suspected rare genetic disease.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- X chromosome inactivation in the human placenta is patchy and distinct from adult tissues.HGG advances · 2022Article
- Preferential X Chromosome Inactivation as a Mechanism to Explain Female Preponderance in Myasthenia Gravis.Genes · 2022Article
- Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021Review
- Inferring genes that escape X-Chromosome inactivation reveals important contribution of variable escape genes to sex-biased diseases.Genome research · 2021Article
- Contribution of genetic and epigenetic changes to escape from X-chromosome inactivation.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- Article
- Cross-species examination of X-chromosome inactivation highlights domains of escape from silencing.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- A new sex-specific underlying mechanism for female schizophrenia: accelerated skewed X chromosome inactivation.Biology of sex differences · 2020Article
- Transmission of X-linked Ovarian Cancer: Characterization and Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Molecular signatures of X chromosome inactivation and associations with clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer.Human molecular genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) epigenetically silences transcription of an X chromosome in females; patterns of XCI are thought to be aberrant in women's cancers, but are understudied due to statistical challenges. We develop a two-stage statistical framework to assess skewed XCI and evaluate gene-level patterns of XCI for an individual sample by integration of RNA sequence, copy number alteration, and genotype data. Our method relies on allele-specific expression (ASE) to directly measure XCI and does not rely on male samples or paired normal tissue for comparison. We model ASE using a two-component mixture of beta distributions, allowing estimation for a given sample of the degree of skewness (based on a composite likelihood ratio test) and the posterior probability that a given gene escapes XCI (using a Bayesian beta-binomial mixture model). To illustrate the utility of our approach, we applied these methods to data from tumors of ovarian cancer patients. Among 99 patients, 45 tumors were informative for analysis and showed evidence of XCI skewed toward a particular parental chromosome. For 397 X-linked genes, we observed tumor XCI patterns largely consistent with previously identified consensus states based on multiple normal tissue types. However, 37 genes differed in XCI state between ovarian tumors and the consensus state; 17 genes aberrantly escaped XCI in ovarian tumors (including many oncogenes), whereas 20 genes were unexpectedly inactivated in ovarian tumors (including many tumor suppressor genes). These results provide evidence of the importance of XCI in ovarian cancer and demonstrate the utility of our two-stage analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.