ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical efficacy of extra-short implant (4 mm) placed in posterior areas: a Meta-analysis.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2023Pooled it
- Biomechanical evaluation of cantilever length and arch form in the All-on-4 implant concept: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of framework material and gyroid lattice design on the biomechanics of all-on-four full-arch prostheses.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of Various Implant Placement Strategies on Stress Distribution in Maxillary Implant-Retained Overdenture: A 3D Finite-Element Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Comparative Evaluation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Rehabilitation Using the All-on-Six Concept with Zygomatic Implant and Tilted Implant as Posterior Implant-Finite Element Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Loading Pressure Induced by 4 mm Implants on the Inferior Alveolar Nerve: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of maxillary posterior three unit bridge supported misial straight implant and distal tilted implant.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Impact of short implants numbers and prosthesis design on stress in the posterior mandible: FE analysis.Dental research journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Toward Digital Twin Development for Implant Placement Planning Using a Parametric Reduced-Order Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical comparison of all-on-4 and all-on-5 implant-supported prostheses with alteration of anterior-posterior spread: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Predictors of peri-implant bone remodeling outcomes after the osteotome sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Comparison of Asymmetric Implant Configurations for All-on-Four Treatment Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of bone anchored hearing aids using a finite element model and its applications to implant stability assessment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Influence of Implant Tilting and Length on the Biomechanics of Single-Tooth Restoration: A Finite Element Analysis in Atrophic Mandible.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Navigated Antral Bone Expansion (NABE): a prospective study on 35 patients with 4 months of follow-up post implant loading.BMC oral health · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the stress values, created in peri-implant region as a consequence of loading on fixed hybrid dentures that was planned with different implant numbers, lengths, or tilting angulations. Thirteen three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis models were generated with four, five, or seven implants (group A, B, and C). Except the distal implants, all implants were modeled at 4.1 mm (diameter) and 11.5 mm (length) in size. Distal implants were configured to be in five different lengths (6, 8, 11.5, 13, and 16 mm) and three different implant inclination degrees (0°, 30°, and 45°). A 150-N load was applied vertically on prosthesis. Released stresses were evaluated comparatively. The lowest von Mises stress values were found in group C, in the 11.5-mm implant model. Tilting the distal implants 30° caused higher stress values. In 45°-tilting implant models, lower stress values were recorded according to the 30°-tilting models. The ideal implant number is seven for an edentulous maxilla. Tilting the implants causes higher stress values. A 45° inclination of implant causes lower stress values according to the 30° models due to a shorter cantilever. The ideal implant length is 11.5 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29119541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.