Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29119500›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018

Conceptual Challenges of the Systemic Approach in Understanding Cell Differentiation.

Andras Paldi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Peptide Regulation of Cell Differentiation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andras PaldiEcole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, UMRS_951, INSERM, Univ-Evry, Genethon, 1 rue de I'Internationale, Evry, 91002, France. paldi@genethon.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cells of a multicellular organism are derived from a single zygote and genetically identical. Yet, they are phenotypically very different. This difference is the result of a process commonly called cell differentiation. How the phenotypic diversity emerges during ontogenesis or regeneration is a central and intensely studied but still unresolved issue in biology. Cell biology is facing conceptual challenges that are frequently confused with methodological difficulties. How to define a cell type? What stability or change means in the context of cell differentiation and how to deal with the ubiquitous molecular variations seen in the living cells? What are the driving forces of the change? We propose to reframe the problem of cell differentiation in a systemic way by incorporating different theoretical approaches. The new conceptual framework is able to capture the insights made at different levels of cellular organization and considered previously as contradictory. It also provides a formal strategy for further experimental studies.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesCell DifferentiationCell Physiological PhenomenaRegenerationAnimalsBiochemical PhenomenaHumansPhenotypeCell differentiationChromatinConceptual frameworkEpigenetic mechanismsMetabolismStochastic fluctuations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.